Battlestations

I’m also software engineer, and I prefer double or triple monitor setup. I need to have the variability to have different information on each monitor, and flipping between multiple virtual desktops as I need.

Just better maintainability for me.

I swear by my 3440x1440 ultrawide monitor. FamcyZones lets it act like a dual monitor without taking up a bunch of desk space I don't have.

I went ultrawide and haven't looked back, for gaming it just makes things better and more immersive, for work it does just as well as at least a dual monitor setup.

Why choose?

I have dual ultrawide monitors and a 24" in portrait mode next to them. The 24" won't connect to my work laptop, but the dual ultrawides give plenty of real estate since I can have four windows open at the same time

It's been said multiple times already, but if you go ultra wide, be sure to download Microsoft's power toys, which comes with fancy zones. It lets you resize areas of your desktop to make it most useful to you

I switched to a single ultra wide and won’t ever go back. The reduced cables is great, having no bezels to deal with is great. I use windows, and either w11 or fancyzones for w10 allows me to set up different window zones that apps will snap to.

Software eng. I have a curve ultra wide in the middle and a 27’ 1080 on each side.

I love having a ton of space!

Also do software. Went from a triple monitor (1080 portrait, 1440 landscape, 1080 portrait) to super ultra wide. The biggest reason was my work laptop only supports two 1440 or one 4k monitors so I use the ultra wide in picture by picture mode.

I miss the vertical space for reading documents but that's kind of it. There is enough horizontal space to have my work open with slack/email/whatever on the side since it's basically two monitors but without the bezel.

I've been enjoying the ultra wide way more when gaming vs the single 1440, by a lot. Don't think I could go back now however I play a lot of fps games that will use the whole monitor.

The only annoying thing is I need to switch to input mode whenever I switch computers but this might not apply to you if all devices can support the native resolution.

I prefer multi-monitor setups, but lately it's been frustrating because I switched to Linux. Attempting to setup any game spanning has all been useless. Best I got it to do was to span a game over two of the three monitors. Oh well.

Currently running 3 Samsung curved monitors, 240hz in the middle, 60hz on the sides.

I had a similar issue with a quality KVM I bought during the pandemic. At the time the issue causing it was having high refresh rates on both monitors I was using.. Turning down them down to 60hz fixed the issue but was a deal breaker for me so I just moved on. If you don't care about 60hz that may fix the issue.

Support said it was a throughput / bandwith issue with their internals not supporting two 144hz screens.

Hope this gives a clue to what may be wrong with yours. (Was on 3440x1440 and a standard 1440p monitor at the time)

I had a 3 monitor setup for years until the primary monitor and its replacement crapped out one month. I switched to a 49” ultrawide, got a tiling window manager and I’ve been loving it! The window manager lets me size windows to fit what best suits me for each. I’ll never go back if I don’t have to

21:9 or 32:9? If you are thinking of buying a 21:9 with 3840x1600 res you could also just buy a 45-50inch 4K 16:9 TV it’s like an ultra wide but with extra space on top. Many lcd TVs nowadays are 120hz and some are even higher.

i've been rocking dual monitors since the early 00's.

for the last decade or so, i've used a primary monitor, with a decent sized TV on the wall above it. recently i upgraded the TV to a 45 inch 4K model. i mainly did it so i could give one of my kids the previous TV. i typically watch a fair bit of high def stuff on it.

the part i wasn't prepared for, on making the jump to 4K, was how useful the real estate was for productivity.

I recently redid my setup and did a curved widescreen as my primary and a 24 inch widescreen on the side. I went this route instead of a single larger monitor for a few reasons.

• easily have multiple devices hooked up. I have some nuc form factor firewalls and servers that I might want to rebuild on my desk rather than in the utility room with an HDMI capture dongle. Two monitors makes it easy without losing my main display or constantly plugging and unplugging. I could accomplish this with picture by picture, but still not as fully flexible.

• for games I like to have my teamspeak and browser window on the second monitor without it sharing the main monitor or having to tab around. The tiling tools didn't quite cut it for me and some games don't offer windowed modes.

• with two monitors on arms I can physically reconfigure as needed. I'll move one monitor to be visible from the love seat to watch a movie while leaving the other at the desk to monitor long running processes. I like the physical flexibility of two.

Those were my main reasons; ymmv.

I, uh, yeah well both I guess. I have an ultra wide and then a vertical monitor on the right. If I'm feeling extra fancy I'll even open the laptop lid and make it 3 monitors.

But this is a classic case of por que no los dos for me.

I bought an ultrawide and don't think I could go back. Its good for gaming (when a game knows how to take advantage of it, some still suck at this though) but for productivity it is absolutely a game changer for me.

Highly recommend something like display fusion if you are on windows. You can setup "virtual monitors" so you can "full screen" a game and not take up the whole thing and it works great. Some games are rough at 32:9 aspect ratio so I setup a basic 16:9 ratio virtual monitor in the center, can still see discord on one side and whatever else I need on the other side. Also had a shortcut key to dim everything but active window so you didn't have brightness bleed while gaming. It's great. There are similar features baked into KDE, so I didn't even need further software when I changed to linux.