this post was submitted on 26 Dec 2023
21 points (95.7% liked)
Battlestations
1148 readers
1 users here now
Welcome to /c/Battlestations
A community for sharing your computer, gaming or work setups as well as discussion about anything related to such setups.
- Posts should include a photo of a computer setup of some kind or be a discussion of computer setups.
- Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, ableist, or advocating violence will be removed.
- Be civil: disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally insult others.
- Spam, self promotion, trolling, and bots are not allowed
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Yeah its 100% nicer when you can work on one monitor and have info on the other instead of flipping back and forth on the primary. But there's a certain appeal to having just a huge single monitor... Think it would free up some table space and could keep my gaze more centered. I use ubuntu + i3 for both work and play so I'm wondering if a huge monitor could provide enough visual real estate to keep the convenience of two monitors. If I was using Windows or Mac I'd probably be more inclined to stick to dual monitor
I've not used a ultrawide before as I actually like the natural separation that the 2 or 3 monitors I have brings, it's easy for me to go "this belongs on this screen and that on the other one". I use the tilling in KDE for further breaking windows up if I'm so inclined.
But, if you're already using a tiling manager as your DE then I'd say go for the ultrawide, slightly less desk real estate and you can already get your windows exactly how you want pretty easily with i3, and you can't argue that when you play a movie or game it's going to feel impressive.