this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2023
95 points (92.8% liked)

politics

19316 readers
1724 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Ensign_Crab 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Democratic Party leadership would rather lose every last voter.

[–] Bernie_Sandals 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Israel's war is nowhere near that important in the eyes of most voters.

[–] Zippit 7 points 1 year ago

Let's be real, It's not a war anymore, it's a massacre.

[–] Ensign_Crab -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It doesn't have to be most, it just has to be enough.

And even if it were all voters, the party would prefer to lose them all than change.

[–] Bernie_Sandals 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Okay but if enough people switch from Biden to Stein or West or Kennedy then it'll just guarantee the vote is split between Biden and them and hand the presidency directly to Trump and we both know that'll just make things worse.

[–] Ensign_Crab 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well, enough people don't need to switch to anyone. Enough people just have to stay home. Of course it would be worse and I'm not saying otherwise.

It's a reality, though. The party disregards it at our peril.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Or participate in primaries and local elections. Most of the problems come from how stacked the system already is.

[–] Bernie_Sandals 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Yes, exactly. Dems see the real threat as primaries for sure, and they just don't have the infrastructure to control the nominations at the local level or even with state reps in redder states like they did with the 2016 or 2020 presidential primaries.

[–] Ensign_Crab 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Dems see the real threat as primaries for sure, and they just don’t have the infrastructure to control the nominations at the local level or even with state reps in redder states like they did with the 2016 or 2020 presidential primaries.

I dunno. They had the infrastructure to make sure Henry Cuellar beat Jessica Cisneros.

[–] Bernie_Sandals 2 points 1 year ago

I should've specified, by state rep I meant in the state's house of representatives, those can often have democrats that are more radical like the Tennessee Three (Go Gloria), and the NY State House DSA members.

They're much more able to target progressives/socialists in the federal house, especially if they haven't built up as much support from residents of the state before going federal like Gloria Johnson (or hopefully soon the other two members of the TN 3).

[–] Ensign_Crab 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

"Your party is supporting genocide, but now it's your fault for not being more active at the local level."

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's that's how you feel then that's your choice. Republicans fully plan to attack the system entirely in their favor despite not being the popular party and the Democratic party is starting to recognize the need to appeal to younger voters. Just don't abstain from voting entirely.

[–] Ensign_Crab 0 points 1 year ago

It’s that’s how you feel then that’s your choice.

God almighty, the passive aggression is worse than the usual overt condescension.

the Democratic party is starting to recognize the need to appeal to younger voters.

Based on what evidence?

[–] almar_quigley 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

What democrats do you think are actually switching to Kennedy? That guy is a lunatic way more aligned with the right than left.

[–] Bernie_Sandals 3 points 1 year ago

Yeah Kennedy has less of a chance from pulling from Biden now. Whoever ends up on the green party ticket is still gonna be a problem for that though.

[–] dragonflyteaparty 1 points 1 year ago

Those who aren't paying attention and just recognize the Kennedy name. Those who know that he initially ran as Democrat and switched to independent.