this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2023
1933 points (98.0% liked)

piracy

676 readers
1 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
1933
Title (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 year ago by sebinspace to c/piracy
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 102 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I mean, it's not

It's piracy, a different crime

A crime I love committing babyyyyyyyyyy

[–] [email protected] 37 points 1 year ago

We here at Futurama do not condone the cool crime of burglary.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Yeah, when you steal something from someone then he does not have it anymore. With indefinitely replicable virtual goods that is not the case.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] art 83 points 1 year ago (14 children)

If I steal your bicycle
you have to take the bus,
but if I just copy it
there's one for each of us!

[–] Willer 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)

im a bicycle store owner and this is so true

[–] Kase 31 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I like to think this implies that people are coming into your store and cloning the bicycles

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (3 children)

You wouldn't download a bicycle would you?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I absolutely would.

Call me Missingno. Cuz I would have 99 of them shits

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
[–] [email protected] 59 points 1 year ago (3 children)

If I steal food from the store, I'm both robbing the store, and a community that would have paid good money for that food.

If I go to the store and magically have the items on the shelves be duplicated into my cart, and I don't have to pay for them. That is not a crime that is a miracle

[–] Sheeple 29 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Consider this. (big chain) Stores already steal from the community via profits they make.

[–] EmpathicVagrant 20 points 1 year ago

And while we’re on about food, look at how much the grocery stores toss out.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 54 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)
[–] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot 27 points 1 year ago (3 children)

'I wonder who this ship belongs to anyway,' said Arthur.

'Me,' said Zaphod.

'No. Who it really belongs to.'

'Really me,' insisted Zaphod. 'Look, property is theft, right? Therefore theft is property. Therefore this ship is mine, okay?'

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Thteven 20 points 1 year ago

"Fuck EA" ~ Me

[–] lugal 10 points 1 year ago

If I were asked to answer the following question: What is slavery? and I should answer in one word, It is murder!, my meaning would be understood at once. No extended argument would be required to show that the power to remove a man's mind, will, and personality, is the power of life and death, and that it makes a man a slave. It is murder. Why, then, to this other question: What is property? may I not likewise answer, It is robbery!, without the certainty of being misunderstood; the second proposition being no other than a transformation of the first?

Pierre-Joseph Proudhon, What Is Property?

[–] creditCrazy 44 points 1 year ago (9 children)

Also if buying isn't owning than wtf did I buy. In any other time period this corporate shit would be considered a scam.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago

Also if buying isn't owning than wtf did I buy.

"Access." It is such a scam.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (5 children)

You didn't buy anything, we rent now...

Landlords everywhere, even on the internet... It's disgusting. They get to own, we get to borrow...

So to OP, it's still stealing as they own everything, we just rent. Fucking scam for sure :(

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

"YoU BoUgHt a lIcEnSe tO UsE ThE PrOdUcT"

Funny how the word license never comes up until you read the fine print. Colloquially you're buying the product. If we're going by legal technicalities then legally I ain't stealing shit.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 41 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It's the theft of profit they don't like, they don't care if you watch it, just that you give them money for the opportunity to watch.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No, they still don't like it when I buy a copy of a video game and then pirate it as well

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

yup. anti-piracy is about control, not profits. this is trivial to deduce from the simple fact that no one ever measures a drm solution's performance in total sales recovered, they only ever whine about hypothetical lost ones, which is the corporate equivalent of sideways for attention, long way for effect

[–] xenoclast 22 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I think you mean "extract value"

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ChonkyOwlbear 30 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Taking a copy of an infinitely replicable resource is perfectly ethical.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 year ago (1 children)

In a world where people’s lives are sustained by a model that diminishes their income when copying instead of buying, you can’t exactly call it “perfectly ethical”.

You can make an argument that your copying isn’t preventing a sale and that probably works most of the time, but not all the time.

I think “it’s complicated” is a more true statement of the conundrum.

[–] cmhe 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

The issue is that there exists some sort of digital Bourgeoisie, people that just make their money by owning digital data, while the digital proletariat, the artists and programmers, that creates the data aren't well financially compensated or might not even be employed at the company anymore.

Pirates should be mindful who they are hurting, and that depends on the piece of work they are pirating, the time when they are doing it and many other circumstances. That decides if is ethical or not.

Creators should be well compensated for their time and effort, so that they continue to create and if that is the case piracy doesn't matter.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Self published indie game that you really like? Pay for it, support the creator(s)

Music written/recorded by long dead people whose rights are owned by some massive faceless corporation to line the pockets of CEOs and shareholders? Fuck them, pirate away

Future generations will cringe at how much creative innovation has been stifled by our repressive copyright laws, extending it past 20 years flat was a major mistake

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] TropicalDingdong 24 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Idk if it's just me but that image isn't showing.

[–] sebinspace 40 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because it’s webm and that shit can blow me.

[–] troglodytis 10 points 1 year ago

WeBM.

Yes, yes. Everybody Poops.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago

In case you or anyone else is curious, it's a reaction gif of Will Ferrell as Ron Burgundy from Anchorman saying, "I can't argue with any of those points."

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

It's just a reaction gif (in webm format, which is probably why it's not showing for us)

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] OrteilGenou 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] UnculturedSwine 15 points 1 year ago

It's not piracy it's reclamation

[–] LightDelaBlue 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›