this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2023
52 points (96.4% liked)

politics

19162 readers
2716 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Since at least July 2020, prosecutors allege that Han Lee, 41, James Lee, 68, and Junmyung Lee, 30, ran brothels that advertised primarily Asian women under the guise that they were nude models selling their services to professional photographers. The three were charged with conspiracy to coerce and entice to travel to engage in illegal sexual activity.

The brothels’ clients, which prosecutors allege could number in the hundreds, also included tech and pharmaceutical executives, doctors, professors, lawyers, scientists and accountants, according to court filings, which did not name any of the alleged clients. “Pick a profession; they’re probably represented in this case,” said acting U.S. attorney for Massachusetts Joshua Levy at a news conference Wednesday. “They are the men who fueled this commercial sex ring.”

The clients, an affidavit alleges, paid the defendants as much as $600 to engage in sexual activities with women whose nude or semi-nude pictures, height, weight and other identifying features were advertised on two purported modeling websites. The women would meet their customers at one of nine locations, where monthly rent was as high as $3,664, according to the affidavit. The brothels were located in Cambridge and Watertown, Mass., and Fairfax and Tysons, Va., the affidavit stated.

The allegations mirror a sex service that for 13 years catered to Washington’s political elite, including a sitting senator. Known as the D.C. Madam, Deborah Jeane Palfrey was convicted of running that operation in 2008. Records of her ring included the names of 815 clients, and in 2016, Palfrey’s former lawyer said her phone records “could be relevant” to the presidential election. A judge later blocked the release of those records.

all 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] breakingcups 30 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Legalize sex work, with permits and thorough audits. Focus law enforcement on human trafficking and pimping.

[–] Viking_Hippie 8 points 1 year ago

Amen, brother! Sex work is work and sex workers should get the protections all workers deserve, not persecution and oppression!

[–] Viking_Hippie 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Kidding aside, as long as everyone participated consensually and the owners weren't exploiting the workers, I don't see how there's anything wrong with it 🤷

[–] kescusay 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's the hypocrisy. The clients for these escorts were almost certainly conservative, "family-values" assholes.

[–] Viking_Hippie 2 points 1 year ago

Good point!

[–] Potatos_are_not_friends 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What are these numbers? This is "high-end"?

The clients, an affidavit alleges, paid the defendants as much as $600 to engage in sexual activities with women whose nude or semi-nude pictures, height, weight and other identifying features were advertised on two purported modeling websites.

As much as $600? That seems cheap!

Because I've hired a DJs for like $500 a session once and honestly, I could have just got a naked lady with a Spotify account.

The women would meet their customers at one of nine locations, where monthly rent was as high as $3,664, according to the affidavit

Uh so average city rent? We are hitting like 6k a month in some cities 😭

[–] Fades 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yeah I said the same thing, I think that what is happening here is they have varying degrees of deniability while still getting their income. You pay a small cover that is in line with the photographer angle, they are then instructed to secure a place somewhere and take a cut, still not much cash tho surely there are other stipulations and expectations

The other thing to remember is this: our representatives are for sale and they don’t require much to betray the will of those they are supposed to represent. Just look at some of the lobbying $$ that gets passed around, it’s usually not much relatively speaking.

Doesn’t surprise me that they fuck with cheap brothels too

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Lordy let there be receipts.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

And if not, let one of them be spineless and flip on his partners.