this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2023
320 points (98.2% liked)

politics

19143 readers
2602 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Republicans haven't backed off their anti-choice views. Instead, the've tried to bamboozle the voters into thinking that Republicans aren't as radical as they really are. Republicans have played word games, hoping that by rebranding with terms like "pro-baby" or bullying journalists into using the "limits" instead of "bans," they could somehow trick people into not noticing their rights are being stripped.

Tuesday's election showed voters are not fooled.

top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] partial_accumen 47 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ohio Governor Dewine is a perfect example of these manipulation attempts. Prior to yesterday's passage of the state constitutional amendment there was no allowance for abortion under Ohio law for rape or incest.

Dewine went to the airwaves saying essentially "I'm hearing Ohio voters ask for a rape and incest exception for abortion. If the voters agree to vote down the abortion legalizing amendment, I'll work with lawmakers to add this exception."

Dewine you've had years of this knowledge of what the voters wanted. There was even a vote in August signaling the abortion legalization amendment would pass. Why do you have to wait for voters to vote again? If you're being honest, go ahead and get the lawmakers to add the exception to EXISTING law. But no, he's putting the condition that the voters must reject the amendment that will put it into law instead. We don't trust you on this Dewine.

[–] natedog526 24 points 1 year ago

I think we are starting to see a populace that understands political double speak and see through it. Honestly, after this past election, I'm starting to have some hope that shit can turn around.

[–] CharlesDarwin 12 points 1 year ago

The dumbass cons that keep trying to steal rights away and cannot seem to understand the voters' reactions to their efforts need to remember this:

Roe was the compromise, motherfuckers. And you couldn't stand it, and you spent nearly 50 years working to destroy it. And now you must sow what you reaped.