this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2023
257 points (97.1% liked)

Fuck Cars

9633 readers
477 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/7820643

U.S. regulators say they will review the use of a chemical found in almost every tire after a petition from West Coast Native American tribes that want it banned because it kills salmon as they return from the ocean to their natal streams to spawn.

The Yurok tribe in California and the Port Gamble S’Klallam and Puyallup tribes in Washington asked the Environmental Protection Agency to prohibit the rubber preservative 6PPD earlier this year, saying it kills fish — especially coho salmon — when rains wash it from roadways into rivers. Washington, Oregon, Vermont, Rhode Island and Connecticut also wrote the EPA, citing the chemical’s “unreasonable threat” to their waters and fisheries.

The agency’s decision to grant the petition last week is the start of a long regulatory process that could see the chemical banned. Tire manufacturers are already looking for an alternative that still meets federal safety requirements.

“We could not sit idle while 6PPD kills the fish that sustain us,” Joseph L. James, chairperson of the Yurok Tribe, told The Associated Press. “This lethal toxin has no business in any salmon-bearing watershed.”

top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Whenever someone bring up electric cars as a fix I just say : "tires"

[–] themusicman 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"Tires" may not be the strongest argument against electric cars, but it's certainly succinct. Personally, I'd probably pick "traffic", at the cost of an extra syllable

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

It's an entry point for explaining how personal vehicles if inherently inefficient

[–] FireRetardant 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Tires, 8 lane roadways, massive swathes of parking lots often taking valuable land, the electricity powering it has to be green, road maintainance/resurfacing.

EVs only really solve the gasoline problem with cars, they solve little else.

[–] TheFeatureCreature 2 points 1 year ago

As NotJustBikes put it: EV's are not here to save the planet; they're here to save the car industry.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Only car tires or is it all rubber tires?