this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2023
88 points (97.8% liked)

News

23644 readers
4118 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The US Supreme Court on Monday barred two Texas-based manufacturers from selling products that can be quickly converted at home into firearms called “ghost guns”, granting a request by Joe Biden’s administration to once again block a federal judge’s order that had sided with companies.

The justices lifted Fort Worth-based judge Reed O’Connor’s 14 September injunction barring enforcement of a 2022 federal regulation – a rule aimed at reining in the privately made firearms – against the two manufacturers, Blackhawk Manufacturing and Defense Distributed.

all 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SuperJetShoes 15 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Brit here. I have a couple of questions:

  1. If they aren't firearms, then what are they sold as? Replicas?
  2. If they aren't sold as weapons, does that mean someone could import one into my own country?

(I have no intention of doing this, in case this triggers some GCHQ bot and my home ends up like Waco but without all the tiddies)

[–] Blackbeard 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (1 children)
[–] SuperJetShoes 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wow what a detailed, well-written and fascinating response. Thank you for writing that, I thoroughly enjoyed reading it.

It would almost be worth putting #2 to the test, just to see what would happen. As you mention it would be a legal minefield.

Interestingly (and I guess this is the same in the US?), it's illegal to open someone else's mail. For sure Law Enforcement could get around that, but they would need a court warrant and you'd have to pity the judge whose desk that landed on.

The law states:

84 Interfering with the mail: general

A person commits an offence if, without reasonable excuse, he—

intentionally delays or opens a postal packet in the course of its transmission by post, or intentionally opens a mail-bag.

I think that if the package was innocuous (i.e. didn't have Jeff's Gun's By Post emblazoned on it with a drawing of a strutting Texan blowing the smoke from his revolver), then it could be tough to find “reasonable excuse" to open the package.

Joking aside, if the recipient was a known member of forums promoting hatred or violence then it could be considered reasonable to make at least a cursory examination based on "why was this package received from from there?".

It's legislation with good solid intent (IMHO), but it's so vague that it can't cover everything.

Nor yet anyway.

As we come from different nations, our feelings on the matter may differ and I don't really want to discuss that. But thank you, you've made it easier to understand the context.

[–] Capricorny90210 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
  1. They can sell parts of a firearm, for instance something like an 80% lower, that may not be regulated the same way as an assembled firearm. They can also sell files if they wished, to print or mill firearm parts.

  2. Still depends on UK laws, sorry I'm not familiar with them past (at least I think) the full ban of handguns.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

So for UK firearms, you are allowed them for very specific purposes and can't ever use it outside of those purposes. You have to make your case and get a license before you can buy a gun more powerful than an air rifle/pistol. You can't carry in public, even concealed.

UK law doesn't recognise the concept of defensive weapons, so if you use one, even in self defense, and you don't have any legal context for carrying the gun in the first place, you're fuuuuucked.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I really thought American learned that banning things just makes a black market.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

They did, it creates lucrative and profitable enterprises which is why they keep doing it. Oh wait did you mean this as a bad thing? lol

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Guess I'll see you again when they catch a dude printing Glock switches and ar lowers 🙄

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Meh they're not banning firearms just this one method of making them and this market is already somewhat of a black market considering they're trying to skirt around the laws of the regulated traditional market.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If they prevent these kits from being sold people are just going to get them further outside legal means to get them. Punishing someone harder for the same crime doesn't fix the issue. It just makes people bitter.

Hell "ghost guns" aren't even the issue. Allowing charlatans to have whole news stations with no regulations besides being sued is probably the real issue but we'll sooner solve that issue then the gun violence issue.

[–] JustZ 0 points 1 year ago

That's how laws work. They make something illegal. You have to break the law to do it. You get punished.

Nobody thinks outlawing something will completely end it. But it will make it duck back into its hole and sometimes that the best we can do.

[–] alienanimals 3 points 1 year ago

The supreme court has been corrupted by rich plutocrats.

[–] DreBeast 0 points 1 year ago

Somebody is not getting their cut, otherwise the SC wouldn't block this.