this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2023
145 points (95.6% liked)

World News

39145 readers
3408 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] kitb 76 points 1 year ago (2 children)

None of the recalled cars are EVs, and yet the main photo used in the article is the EV9 and the headline is ambiguous enough to suggest it's EV fires causing the recall.

I'm not saying this is necessarily intentional, but it seems suspicious to me.

[–] neonspool 29 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

i generally like reuters so i submitted feedback (bottom of reuters website) regarding that article in the hopes that something will come of it. i agree that it does seem very weird to do

[–] brlemworld 1 points 1 year ago

Apparently Reuters is a shit rag now

[–] BonfireOvDreams 11 points 1 year ago (7 children)

I cannot for the life of me begin to understand who would still want to buy a kia. The company fucking cuts so many corners that inevitably cost the consumer, irrespective of the engine itself being completely unremarkable.

[–] Mr_Blott 13 points 1 year ago

Just btw, outside of the US, Kias and Hyundais are excellent cars. Something something fool and his money are easily parted something 😂

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Is quality control between US and Europe different here? Haven't had a single issue with my Kia Rio since I bought it 8 years ago.

Besides the motor being lackluster performance wise, but I knew that going in. But hey, for 14k€ (including A/C, navigation, rear camera) it was still a deal.

[–] Mr_Blott 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Very, very different. Remember when Fords were bulletproof reliable? Say that in the States and you'd get laughed out of the room. And that's one of their own companies lol

[–] scottywh 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I've owned lots of Fords in the US over the years and there's nothing worse about them than any other manufacturer as a general rule.

Sure, there are exceptions and people will always take their own anecdotal experiences to heart as indicative of larger problems as a whole with a manufacturer but they make fine vehicles.

In fact, one of my current vehicles is a 2011 Escape that I've had for years and I've got no major problems with or complaints about it.

[–] Potatos_are_not_friends 1 points 1 year ago

My Ford, every year since 2015, there's a new recall where I had to bring it back to a dealership. I think in 2019, there were two of them.

I don't have any experience with other manufacturers, but if this is the state of car ownership... fuck that.

[–] scottywh 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I own a 2012 Kia soul in the US and it's been a great car.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They are shit cars, but this is nothing compared to the other car manufacturers; sticking pedals on Toyotas (21 dead), Ford Pinto (500-900 dead, was an $11 part production deemed unnecessary), GM knew about a faulty switch in 2003 but only fixed it in 2014 (and 174 deaths), Volkswagen lied about emissions causing god knows how much damage, even airbags have killed like 24 people due to a defect. The list is endless, and no car company is better than the other.

Bikes ftw.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Firestone and Ford (271 died)

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I cannot for the life of me understand why people would live in a country where this is allowed just because a bunch of congressmen need a new yacht or child slave or whatever they do with their money

[–] ShittyRedditWasBetter -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because the top half live quite well. At least competitive with every country in Europe and gets better and better once you start pulling in 125k+.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The US median income is $31k/year, so anyone who makes more than that is in the top half you describe. At exactly what income level do you suggest unsafe vehicles is no longer a concern? Because I guarantee the senators and Congress reps are driving the same cars everyone else is with a few exceptions.

[–] ShittyRedditWasBetter -4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

First off, auto issues and recalls are a dime a dozen in the EU as well. Often for things like airbags which is far more likely to hurt you. Second, around 75k a year was when I felt personally comfortable buying a nicer car but ymmv.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Well, the person I was replying to said that people allow unsafe cars because the top half live quite well. My point is that the top half includes many people who are financially struggling, and even people doing ok drive the same cars so of course they wouldn't want them to be unsafe.

I appreciate the note on the EU though. I imagine most places have similar difficulties in managing auto safety

[–] errer 4 points 1 year ago

Yeah, why buy a Kia when you can just steal one with a USB cable?

[–] ShittyRedditWasBetter 2 points 1 year ago

They are cheaper than Honda and Toyota.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


WASHINGTON, Sept 27 (Reuters) - Hyundai (005380.KS) and Kia (000270.KS) are recalling a combined 3.37 million vehicles in the United States due to the risk of engine fires, telling owners to park outside and away from structures until repairs are complete.

The automakers say internal brake fluid leaks can cause an electrical short that could lead to a fire.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) said owners should follow the advice of automakers and park vehicles outside until repairs are made.

Kia America's recall covers 1.73 million Borrego, Cadenza, Forte, Sportage, K900, Optima, Soul Rio, Sorento, and Rondo vehicles.

Hyundai is recalling 1.64 million Elantra, Genesis Coupe, Sonata Hybrid, Accent, Azera, Veloster, Santa Fe, Equus, Veracruz, Tucson, Tucson Fuel Cell, and Santa Fe Sport vehicles from model years covering 2011 through 2015.

Hyundai plans to notify owners to bring vehicles to a dealer to replace the ABS module fuse.


The original article contains 309 words, the summary contains 150 words. Saved 51%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

the formula

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[–] cyd 4 points 1 year ago

It's just a novel anti-theft measure.

[–] Potatos_are_not_friends 1 points 1 year ago

Kia is having a hell of a reputation burn.

Kia's looked great price wise two decades ago.

But now they're just toys for thieves, with how lax their security is.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

Another day, another admonition by HMC not to park their deathtrap shitboxes indoors.