this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2023
436 points (96.8% liked)

politics

19155 readers
3355 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 45 points 1 year ago (3 children)

How many abortions do you think this motherfucker paid for?

[–] Bdtrngl 35 points 1 year ago (1 children)

3-5 fewer than he should have sadly.

[–] Daft_ish 2 points 1 year ago

Did you guys hear about Jared's laptop? Real scary stuff. People are talking about it.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago

Him personally? Not a single one, he's a tight fisted cunt. How many abortions he probably caused other people to pay for is a significantly higher number.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

He could have afforded five more…

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago

It will happen suddenly, unilaterally, and in that weird messy way where it gets tied up in court for forever but somehow goes into effect anyway, or it gets blocked but has a "chilling effect" on the population such that the ultimate goal is nonetheless achieved.

It will be stupid, there will be countless of hours of argument wasted on whether he can "actually" do it even though he just did, and people will be screwed over.

If you don't like how that sounds, please do something now.

[–] MajesticSloth 25 points 1 year ago

Trump lying, who would have guessed that?

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago

I laughed when I heard him say he'll take a moderate position and make everyone happy or whatever he tried to pull. Trying to play both sides and it makes no sense.

[–] badbytes 14 points 1 year ago

Every headline like this can be shortened to "Trump is lying"

[–] snekerpimp 11 points 1 year ago

Hey, if his mouth is moving, lies are coming out.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

How is this walking meat bag of cocaine and cholesterol still alive ?

[–] thisisawayoflife 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

*Congress will ban it nationwide.

[–] nbafantest 6 points 1 year ago

It will start with Trump appointed judges slowly attacking Blue States rights.

[–] DigitalFrank -5 points 1 year ago (5 children)

No he won't, because he can't even if he wants to. Overturning Roe sent the issue back to the states, it is no longer a Federal matter. This is fear porn for the Left base.

[–] Daft_ish 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Lol, "the Supreme Court can't reverse Roe v. Wade, it's settled law. The left is always needlessly fear mongering."

"Brett Kavanagh swore under oath he would not be a part of overturning Roe v. Wade. The left ruined this poor man's reputation."

"Mitch McConnel won't force through a justice in an elec..." who am I kidding no one thought that.

[–] nbafantest 15 points 1 year ago

It is absolutely not. The Republican party voters cannot leave this as a states issue.

If you watched the first Republican National Debate, there is almost widespread agreement that the republican party will start attacking Blue states rights in the courts until they can get a federal ban passed somehow.

I cannot state how incredibly wrong you are about this.

Republican voters will not elect people who want to leave it up to the states and think the abortion issue is settled.

[–] assassin_aragorn 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Your comment reads like "Don't threaten me with the supreme court!" in 2016. Overturning Roe was fear porn for the Left too, but the Right was crazy enough to actually do it. It's incredibly foolish to write this off, only for the next Republican administration to ban it.

If precedent mattered, then Barrett wouldn't have been considered by the Senate, since they had just established in 2016 that you can't confirm a judge in an election year. The hypocrisy clearly isn't a disqualifier in Barrett's eyes. Alito thinks the Court is quite literally above the law. And Thomas has a sweet gig where he's getting loads of free shit and vacations in return for being as conservative as possible.

Don't assume that the Court will be consistent, especially since they were already inconsistent by overturning Roe. They'd already blowing up in their face, and I say we should toss barrels of gasoline on that fire. We need a heavily blue Congress to remind Alito that he is a servant, not a king.

[–] DigitalFrank -5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

since they had just established in 2016 that you can’t confirm a judge in an election year

In a President's second term, I believe that was the description.

[–] Daft_ish 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

McConnell certainly wasn't that craven when he made up his stupid rule that he would go back on only 4 years later.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Drinking age is a state issue too, but the federal government controls it fully.

[–] DigitalFrank -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Yes, with the club of Highway funding. What pretense can they use for abortion? Neither party is going to go after medicare/medicaid, or anything health related, they would be destroyed at the polls.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Anything they want. Republicans are already planning way to go after Medicare. Don’t put it past them to figure out how to do it.