this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2023
680 points (97.2% liked)

politics

18985 readers
3703 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)

"Unwitting Westerners" they definitely be witting.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There's also plenty of it through entirely witting Westerners.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Have you seen Gab? That is where most of it is dumped and consumed.

Russian trolls will push a US political point on Gab and right wing politicians will pick it up and spew it out on the news. It's really sickening if you ever decide to dig into that mess.

[–] jugalator 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

At least they're trying to. Fortunately, the Russian psyops seem pretty poor in this war and they haven't even managed to pull off any false flag operation to the point of causing contoversy among Ukraine's western allies, and the support remains as strong as one could hope for this long into the war.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

In other news, water is wet.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I'm not even saying this is necessarily untrue, but the irony in this article is palpable.

If commenting on bias in reporting then I can't help but recall the seminal work on the topic in the West in Manufacturing Consent. , particularly the section of the model on sourcing.

I mean, how can you read this article about FSB influence and just ignore the sourcing sentence stating:

US intelligence agencies believe

Agencies we also know have deceived the public.

Again, this isn't unnecessarily untrue, but don't be blind to the other side of it either.

Not everyone you disagree with online is a witting/unwitting Russian agent, especially tiny Lemmy communities.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] pgx 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's scarey how much of the popular conservative media in the US seems to be paid off by Russia.

But you see it everywhere you look, there were just news reports of Nicholas Sarkozy bending over backwards to talk about how reasonable he thinks Putin is and how France needs Russia.

Fucking crazy, but some people really do listen to this shit and end up having their world views shaped by what they see as their trusted sources.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Arsenal4ever 4 points 1 year ago

The two countries with the most vaccines and the least number of people vaccinated are the US and Russia. Russia's vaccine isn't even from the evil west! But still people won't take it.

You propagandize enough people and they don't trust you when you're telling them the truth.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Newly discovered US official intel says "no u"

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›