this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2023
173 points (95.3% liked)

politics

19626 readers
3503 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 52 points 1 year ago (1 children)

He could never set a single foot on the campaign trail and still win the nomination by a ridiculous amount, sadly. And he knows it.

GOP voters are ridiculous.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Not only that, it'll benefit him. The other candidates can fight it out among each other, but the attention of the media is going to be entirely on Trump the entire time.

All publicity is good publicity, and especially so for Trump.

[–] dragonflyteaparty 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I really wish the media would find something else to focus on and maybe put the country above ratings garnered by Trump's nonsense.

[–] PwnTra1n 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

if he didn't say that he would only have bad publicity ¯\(ツ)

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That photo is even less flattering than the real mugshot. What a strange choice for a “fan”.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Never join a cult of personality, it always ends pathetically like this

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Josip Broz Trump

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

FTA:

"he’ll be required to be in court for his four criminal trials across four jurisdictions, and those could last for weeks at a time while voting is underway."

By point of comparison, Fani Willis' last big RICO trial was for a Georgia school cheating scandal, 12 defendants, and it took EIGHT MONTHS.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atlanta_Public_Schools_cheating_scandal

For a bunch of teachers, test coordinators, and administrators.

Trying a former President and his lawyers could easily take a year or more.

[–] Fredselfish 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why she pushing for an October trail date. And why Trump wants to delay it for years so he can become president and escape his crimes.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

She has her ducks in a row, she's ready to go.

Two defendants have invoked Georgia's "speedy trial" law which means their trials HAVE to be held before 11/3 or the charges will be dropped.

Because the RICO charge hits ALL of them, Willis is like "Game on, you want early trials? EVERYONE gets early trials..."

[–] Fredselfish 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They probably invoke them because they thought she can't meet the deadline or the courts will delay it.

What the chances of the courts holding ths up? You look at New York and the other indictments and trails for those not set until long into next year.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Hard to say, Chesebro has already been granted 10/23 as his date, which is what Willis wanted, in fact she went "Fine, 10/23 for EVERYONE." I doubt there will be any delay on the court side.

[–] dojan 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How is he still eligible to be voted into office?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Because he's legally innocent until proven otherwise and therefore has not forfeit his eligibility yet.

There is a legal process, and it should be followed.

Just because many people think he is guilty doesn't mean that the normal juristical procesd can be skipped.

He will lose eligibility early enough (i hope)

[–] dojan 4 points 1 year ago

Good point. To be fair, if the bullshit he's openly admitted to doing, and been seen doing, isn't enough to stop him I don't see why a couple of accusations would.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm not sure getting convicted technically removes his eligibility either. From what I've read, he could theoretically run from prison, win, and pardon himself at least at the federal level. That won't help with state charges, but it's a super fun constitutional crisis to consider!

[–] aaaa 5 points 1 year ago

And there's technically nothing legally preventing a state-convicted felon from getting elected while serving his sentence in state prison.

It's ridiculous that we're even this close to finding out if it could happen