this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2023
72 points (98.6% liked)

Toronto

1611 readers
3 users here now

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Friends:
Support lemmy.ca

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 61 points 1 year ago (4 children)

If a single location consistently has a problem with speeding drivers, you've got a poorly designed road.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Definitely. And yet they never seem to redesign the roads for the speed we want.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Let's redesign streets for the benefit of the people who live there, rather than the speed and convenience of the cars that drive through. I'm sick of the noisy and dangerous traffic around the place where I live, and I can't afford to move.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Stroads... Canada is FULL of them. I wish they'd design streets here like they do in the Netherlands. I lived there for years and it was awesome.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Stroads: The infrastructure that sucks for everyone, pedestrians, cyclists, transit users, and drivers all the same.

But that's the Canadian way. Everyone gets a trophy. We're too "polite" to pick a favourite. We hope that in doing so we can make everyone happy, but end up making everyone unhappy.

The people of the Netherlands are known for being much more, let's say, blunt. They're not afraid to choose a winner.

[–] Alexstarfire 2 points 1 year ago

How else do they get money from the people?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Just need speed bumps. Speed bumps every few blocks on every street where the limits are below 60km/h. There's no more sure way short of rebuilding the entire roads.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Just add bike lanes on both sides. :P /s

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Fucking stupid headline trying to suggest that speed enforcement in a city plagued by road casualties, is simply a cash grab

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

I don't disagree, but it's funny to me how certain things are prioritized because they are cash grabs. There are many other aspects of driving that need to be policed which aren't limited to speeding, red lights, and parking. It feels like the police/city are disinterested in pursuing anything else, I'm assuming because effort is involved. I see drivers so often fucking around with phones / eyes on something other than the road which is as dangerous as, if not more dangerous than, going 10 km/h over the speed limit. I see tons of super aggressive driving too.

I'm not saying stop speed enforcement with cameras, but maybe police other things that aren't immediately profitable too.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

So, what's the excuse for not having one on every street?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They're really expensive, apparently. But hey, I think moving them around to the most lucrative locations to maximize earnings for the city (assuming they actually get to collect the money), could be a nice way to help subsidize road maintenance or TTC costs.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They’re really expensive, apparently.

Yeah, probably too expensive to literally put them on EVERY street, but they are a tiny investment for the amount of return you get on roads where speeding is common (i.e. the places where these tend to be installed).

If you tell drivers that revenue generated through speeding tickets will towards paying for cycling infrastructure, I'm sure the rates of speeding would plummet. LOL

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The issue is less the cost of the device, but for them to work, someone has to process those tickets. That's judges, police, clerks, etc. That's the expensive part and why they aren't the cash grab they look like.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

but for them to work, someone has to process those tickets. That’s judges, police, clerks, etc. That’s the expensive part and why they aren’t the cash grab they look like.

According to ASE Ontario, only a provincial offences officer reviews the ticket before issuing a fine. I guess if the ticket is contested, it would involve the courts, just like any other ticket. And you'd have to be an idiot to contest one of these tickets, which has a photo of you speeding. LOL

They also say "The total payable indicated on the ticket includes the set fine, court costs and the victim fine surcharge, which is credited to the provincial victims’ justice fund account."

Either way, tickets need to be issued, and this just speeds up the process AND reduces speeding in the areas they are implemented.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They increase traffic accidents

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Need more cameras.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

I guess the City of Toronto has tolled expressways after all. For rich, impatient people.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Kinda wish they'd put up more of those. Encourage safer behaviour on the streets and help plug the hole in the city budget.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

Voters really dislike them because voters like to speed

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Anyone know how fast you have to be going to get a ticket there? Asking for a friend.