this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2023
189 points (92.8% liked)

Voyager

5270 readers
73 users here now

The official lemmy community for Voyager, an open source, mobile-first client for lemmy.

Download on App Store

Download on Play Store

Use as a Web App

Download on F-Droid

Rules

  1. Be nice.
  2. lemmy.world instance policy

Sponsor development! πŸ‘‡

Number of sponsors badge

πŸ’™

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

It's very nice to see that X people liked a post/comment and Y people disliked it instead of just having a singular "goodness/badness" rating. It (literally, in a mathematical sense) adds a whole new dimension to post ratings and gives us a more nuanced understanding of people's opinions. Plus, it feels a lot better to see that 5 people agreed with you and 7 disagreed when you made a controversial statement instead of just seeing a score of -1 telling you how bad you are.

all 46 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 26 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Agree. It gives perspective.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago

100%. I'm still a bit shocked there are instances that block down votes and vehemently defend the decision. I mean, didn't everyone raise a huff when YouTube disabled dislike? I can only imagine someone got down voted into oblivion once and reacted with "Down votes are bad."

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

I think it’s totally fine to have the option, personally I find it the "goodness/badness" percentage to be more appropriate. A post could have 1000 upvotes with 5 down and I’d only look at the 5 and think "wow, so many disliked this" where it’s actually 99.5% positive.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Reddit used to have this functionality too (RES would expose it in the UI). Later they removed it and only showed if a comment was controversial. Very refreshing indeed to see the up and down votes again!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

They fuzz the numbers a bit "to make it harder for vote manipulation bots to see if they're working" or something like that too. It makes the upvote percentage almost useless.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

That was the official line, which was classic doublespeak, because it's technically true, but also total bullshit. Even with the vote fuzzing it was easy to tell when a post or comment was heavily downvoted. Advertisers and astroturfers hated this, because it meant that when users recognized their posts as trash and voted accordingly, it was that much harder to make them seem organic and innocent. When reddit obscured the vote tallies, it also destroyed transparency and made it easier for bad actors to game the karma system to push their own agenda.

[–] Anonymousllama 8 points 10 months ago

It's an integral part of online content, being able to both upvote and downvote. I'm amazed how it's still so divisive given that it's been the norm for over a decade on Reddit

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago

Also the reason why I’ve avoided so many of the alternative web apps for lemmy that try to hide the downvotes.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

And there’s also a β€œcontroversial” sort coming (Reddit had similar right?), which ranks posts with many but balanced votes … which as you say, can be quite interesting.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

I've always wondered what the actual vote counts were for controversial posts. It was amusing to see reddit posts with like 2 points and 300 comments.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago

It's amazing.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago

Some people can't see the difference, but a comment with +4 could be a 1004/1000 or a 4/0 and there's a world of difference there.

It's like Fallout New Vegas's rep system.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I also like that you can hide vote count altogether. This is something that I wish other apps had. It's great for people like me who want to read and judge comments by their own merit as opposed to vote count

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Does your husband sell half-baked maps of an ancient kingdom brought to ruin?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

I was extremely confused for a second there but yes, he hasn't been back in ages.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Couldn't agree more. As someone not shying away from controversial discussions reddit used to be frustrating because it created the illusion that no-one ever agrees with you. I don't at all mind the total points being negative when I can atleast see that third of the people still agree with me.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

Right! It's either everyone agrees with you or everyone hates you.

[–] BilboBargains 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The most illuminating aspect of Lemmy has been in contrast with what Reddit has become in recent years. It's difficult to make nuanced or light hearted comments in Reddit without misunderstandings or receiving a lot of negative feedback. The Lemmy userbase seems to be dominated by refugees from Reddit. I'm amazed how long Reddit managed to hang on to it's core principles and I think that can be credited to the diffuse structure. Now that they've committed to the unified corporate goal of profit it will completely go down the shitter in the way Facebook and the other popular platforms have.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

I've noticed that people on Reddit are exceptionally bad at spotting satire and sarcasm. It's not a whole lot better here, but it is a bit. I think that it's just difficult in general without being able to hear people's tone.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

I like that I can see this post has 9 downvotes.

[–] vampyre 3 points 10 months ago (2 children)

How are you seeing the split votes? I can only see the aggregate number.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago

It's not on by default. Check the settings.

[–] yesterdayshero 2 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Depends on the app you're using.

[–] vampyre 2 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I’m using Voyager, as the community name suggests the OP is. Using the AppStore version on iOS which may make a difference.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

Settings > Appearance > Display Votes > Separate

[–] yesterdayshero 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

You should have an option. I'm not on iOS. But try go to settings > appearance and there should be a Votes section that lets you pick separate.

[–] vampyre 1 points 10 months ago

I’m an idiot. I did look there, saw the voting buttons option and missed the β€˜show votes’ which is right at the end.

Thanks for that :)

[–] LaughingFox 1 points 10 months ago

Aww man I'm using Sync, I don't see options to change it, all I see is how many points a post has.

[–] madcaesar 2 points 10 months ago

Very cool, just also please allow me to stop collapsing comments on click! It's so annoying!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It's also possible to view what account upvoted you by viewing your post on a Kbin instance.

I think it's rather silly that this information is obfuscated on Lemmy.

And it's only possible to upvote on Kbin. Which makes more sense to me as well.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Do you need a kbin account for that? If not, how do you see it?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

No account needed.

  1. Select the triple dots menu in Voyager to copy a link to your OP

  2. Visit kbin.social

  3. Enter the copied link in the search bar

  4. Open your OP

  5. Click 'more' and then 'activity'

  6. Click 'favorites'

You'll see a list of all accounts that upvoted your OP. Why this isn't possible on Lemmy is completely unclear to me.

Just like I don't understand why Lemmy allows for downvotes. It's not valuable and induces toxic behavior IMO.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Woah, I can even see who downvoted on there! It does seem to be a bit behind though, as I see less upvotes and only one (instead of 12) downvotes.

IMO allowing downvotes is good because when used properly, it can filter out toxic and hateful content more effectively than just allowing upvotes, as well as giving people a way to reduce the visibility of misinformation. A good case study for this trying to find a good tutorial for something on YouTube before and after the removal of dislikes.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

when used properly

That's the problem. Downvotes often aren't used properly.

[–] SilentSeven -3 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Huh? Where do I see this? If it matters I'm using sync on android.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)
[–] SilentSeven 2 points 10 months ago

Man....tough crowd...down vote hate for an innocent question with a bit of info on my client. Feels like somewhere....we all left.

[–] yesterdayshero 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

You can't on Sync as far as I'm aware.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

But at least we can pay a premium price to maybe receive it in the future! Because the dev is doing gods work and whatnot.

[–] yesterdayshero 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Yeah there's definitely a bit of a circle jerk happening with Sync. People proclaiming it was the best Lemmy app ever, while up until a few days ago you couldn't even submit a post.

Edit: realised I even got downvoted for pointing out Sync doesn't have that functionality. How ironic that the only reason I can see that is because I'm not using Sync haha

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

People have to justify paying premium money for a beta in every way they can. Imagine Boost releases and is better in every way, and people have spent upwards of 120 dollars on Sync. I don't understand the rush.

Edit: Just out of curiosity, you running Voyager or smth else?

[–] yesterdayshero 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Voyager. I've tried a couple others but keep coming back to it.

Yeah with the cost of Sync. I don't think it's right. This isn't Reddit. I've donated money to support a local instance and I'll donate to Voyager as well. I'm for supporting developers. But this is an ad free platform, so it feels wrong to pay so much for an app that adds ads to it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

Yeah I agree. Creating a problem and taking "donations" to solve it is a bit sketchy especially when the instances themselves could use that funding. And when the whole idea of the platform is the other direction.