this post was submitted on 10 Aug 2023
121 points (96.2% liked)

worldnews

1764 readers
1 users here now

Welcome! This community is constantly upgrading and is a current work in progress. Please stay tuned.

/c/[email protected] strives for high-quality standards on the latest world events.

The basis of these standards comes from the MBFC, which uses an aggregate of methodologies, including the IFCN and World Freedom Indices, to rate the Bias and Factual Reporting of News.

These are non-profit organisations with full transparency of their funding and structure. Likewise, this community is also transparent – Please feel free to question its staff and the overall content of this community.


Does your post fit the standards? Check this thread!



Rules:


Disallowed submissions

Commenters will receive one public warning with only one strike if violating any of the following rules:

Thank you.

todo list:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 51 points 1 year ago (5 children)

The police protecting the capital class? Say it ain’t so.

[–] MorgoFett 36 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah. Too bad they won’t “crack down” on polluting corporations and private jet fliers. :/

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But those guys are following the law, so it’s cool and good. Don’t ask who writes the laws though.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Or what, you'll arrest me?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] rockSlayer 30 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Bourgeois democracy showing it's face. Anything that challenges their hegemonic power, including climate action against oil companies, will be labeled as eco-terrorists. When that happens, it will either successfully silence the people trying to prevent climate chaos or lead to more extreme action.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Still more free than most of the world, unfortunately.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago

Funny. I've never rooted for a "criminal organization" before.

I am going to look into how I can donate to this "Last Generation"

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Roadblocks on major motorways in Britain have caused traffic chaos, protests at oil installations in Germany have disrupted supplies, and in France, thousands of activists and police clashed over water usage, leaving dozens injured.

State authorities in Germany are widely using preventative detention to stop people from protesting, including holding at least one person for as long as 30 days without charge, which is permissible under Bavarian law, the prosecutors consulted by Reuters said.

Responding to a Reuters question about sharing intelligence about climate activists between European governments, Germany's interior ministry said it held regular information exchanges with foreign partners, but declined to give details.

Bavaria’s prosecutor has led a clampdown on The Last Generation, along with an investigation into whether to classify it as a criminal organization under a law that allows widespread telephone surveillance, GPS tracking and property searches.

Late in 2022, climate activists dressed in white hazmat-style suits, entered a French cement factory owned by Lafarge Holcim at night, chopping power connections with bolt cutters and smashing installations with hammers, according to a video released by a network called Les Soulevements de La Terre (SLT).

In March, SLT members joined a protest that aimed to disable under-construction irrigation reservoirs that will pump groundwater for large farms in a drought-hit wetland in Deux-Sevres in the Nouvelle Aquitaine region.


I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Protests at oil installations make sense, and people protesting in a way that inconveniences politicians is something I love to see.

But I don’t know what Just Stop Oil is hoping to achieve with a lot of their protests in Britain. They seem to do more harm than good, and actually turn a lot of people who are on the fence against their cause.

They don’t seem to bring attention to the issues, only attention to themselves. And they’ve managed to turn a lot of people from “not interested” to actively against them and their cause.

[–] raginghummus 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If anyone is "actively against them" then the media is failing to properly inform. We are talking about the end of civilisation as we know it, this is not "their cause", this affects every single person on earth.

It's not true that "everybody talks about it anyway". They don't. It's rarely spoken about with the candor required. When was the last time you saw a climate scientist on the news?

As long as awareness of the crisis goes up (which it does), then Just Stop Oil popularity doesn't matter.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

From this point on awareness inevitably goes up as we start to see the effects of climate change first hand.

I don’t know what news you’ve been watching, but I see climate change discussed near daily. ULEZ has been in the news recently and people are talking about the politics surrounding how we actually take action when it’s being impeded by NIMBY people, which is a productive discussion to have.

Meanwhile, all the talk about Just Stop Oil is around the disruption they cause and people saying they hate them. Nobody brings up Just Stop Oil and talks about their cause.

Morally they’re in the right, but in reality they’re harming their cause more than helping it. 10+ years ago these tactics would’ve brought more attention than climate change was getting, now they’re a distraction.

[–] raginghummus 5 points 1 year ago

You're right that exposure in the news has gone up due to the extreme weather events, I have still seen reports highlighting the fires and floods and failing to mention the climate crisis in them. But they still don't bring on climate scientists and they still don't make people aware we are on track for mass crop failures, a billion climate refugees, millions of climate deaths that put together means collapse of our society as we know it.

Even if people don't talk about JSOs demand (which is entirely reasonable and backed by the science, btw), they know why these people out there. They also know they feel strongly enough about it to get shouted abuse, risk getting assaulted and get arrested. That does get through to people.

Please stop calling it "their cause", it's yours too.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's publicity. Bad publicity yes, but the message is being seen even if it's not being recieved well

[–] raltoid -5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

They're basically the PETA of climate change. Where they often harm their own cause because they operate by the creed that more people would be on their side "if they only knew", so most of what they do is designed mainly to get attention from the public.

A great example being the video of a medical professional yelling a bunch of them. Because they glued themselves to the main road ambulances used to get to the ER.

[–] raginghummus 3 points 1 year ago

Of course more people would be on their side if they knew the collapse of society was at stake! And more people are on their side, where do you think all these people slow marching keep coming from?