This is helpful when you get errors: https://ohshitgit.com/
xkcd
A community for a webcomic of romance, sarcasm, math, and language.
As someone new to using git.. Thank you!!
I've been using git for 10+ years and still sometimes do this. I know I could fix it, I also pretty much know what to do to fix it. However nuking the thing from orbit and restarting takes like 30 secs, so it's never worth fixing.
Git is something that is very comfortable to use after a year or two, but when you initially start using it, it is just so easy to mess things up in ways that are unrecoverable. I remember the silly days when I'd back up all my changes first before using git since I would so regularly lose everything through a combination of git commands.
It's easy for me now, but the initial stages punish mistakes severely. It's the dark souls of source control, except it's not really fun. It's just a very beginner unfriendly tool.
A good GUI can solve most problems.
If my colleagues mess something up in their fancy GUIs, they come to me to fix it in the terminal.
My experience is the opposite. A colleague who uses SourceTree and git console (for use cases not covered by SourceTree) asked me a few times to fix his branches when something went wrong (after using git console). I easily fixed it using SmartGit (paid software).
Is there a really good free Git GUI for Linux? I have tried a bunch of them but all the good ones seem to be closed source and paid.
I like SourceTree and it's free. I don't use it all the time, but if I've made a bunch of changes debugging something and I want to easily discard all of the debugging-only changes, the UI makes it really easy to commit or discard individual lines from the changeset.
Additionally, I set up an alias to open it from the command line (stree
) and have it show whatever git directory I opened it from.
Will it run on Linux? I use Sourcetree on Windows but didn't think it was available for Linux.
Guess it's a bit subjective what would be considered good, but personally I like gitk
. It's good enough for me at least.
Git --gud
Wrekted 'em!
I literally did this yesterday.
I've since found chats with Bing are surprisingly informative.
I'm using Mercurial for the last 2 years at current company, before that it was 5-7 years of Git on various jobs. It's so much better if you use it correctly (no long-living or big branches). I forgot what hell Git was sometimes.
I have used Mercurial at work for years, and Git for side projects. I screw up far less often in Mercurial, and its tools are easy to use. It's strange how thoroughly Git took over.
It's not that strange. Microsoft owns GitHub.
GitHub acquisition was fairly recent compared to how long git seems to be the standard
I miss mercurial so much. Such a better UX.
I used hg until python switched to git.
if python isn't going to bother them the battle is lost.
SVN gang rise up.
There's dozens of us! Dozens!
Shit, I lost the thumb drive that has my entire career's output on it.
SCCS represent!
It's all fun and games until your colleague has to pull a PR branch... using fast-forward.
just rebase your fucking PR so I don't have to deal with it, thank you.
IME, to use git effectively, and make sense of the man-pages, you have to know a lot of the internals of how git works. I found it helpful to read "Git from the bottom up" when I had to start using it professionally: https://jwiegley.github.io/git-from-the-bottom-up/
That looks helpful, thank you.