this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2025
461 points (96.0% liked)

Showerthoughts

32778 readers
1049 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 hour ago

If you ever feel like what you are doing is meaningless, remember that there is someone in a BMW factory installing indicators.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 hour ago

If you ever feel like what you are doing is meaningless, remember that there is someone in a BMW factory installing indicators.

[–] Lemminary 7 points 13 hours ago
[–] [email protected] 66 points 1 day ago (3 children)

They will be indispensable for documenting, for historians, what it was like when the United States still had law.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 13 hours ago

oh honey, you, um... that...

who wants to tell them? I can't.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 day ago (2 children)

We don’t need historians. We need people who are willing to risk their career to put up a fight. Documenting is just a word for being a bystander and let it happen.

[–] InverseParallax 4 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

The Palantir threat model specifically says only a fringe will put up a fight right now.

There's a projected line in the sand where people stand up, but so long as you stay on one side, you're safe, and the scary thing is, you can push that line and it will move.

The plan is to be super aggressive now to move the line, then 12 months from now to act all domestic abuser who regrets it and love bombing to cancel out most of the anger before the midterms.

In their defense, this is exactly how Reagan did it and it worked.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I think as you get younger, people are much more aware of abuse dynamics than they were in the past. I think their models may be off.

[–] InverseParallax 3 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

This is the interesting part!

We Americans believe we are all blessed by the holy aura of freedom and democracy.

These models were trained on 3rd world countries.

Let's see how far they work, maybe we really are just as weak and corrupt as those we hold in contempt.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

not an american thing. product of global culture, generally. the kids (and to a lesser extent, the middle aged) are a lot more aware of abuse dynamics specifically. I don't think it's just america.

americans are ABSOLUTELY as weak as those they hold in contempt. corrupt... depends on their politics; the left holds some pretty intensely corrupt bastards in contempt.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 day ago

You need both.

You need people to fight now, and people to document the shit out of this to cut through as much propaganda as possible for the future.

The current regime has already started to rewrite history, documenting the truth is putting up a fight!

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago

If they also aren't "discarded."

[–] partial_accumen 32 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I look forward all of this scholars writing "Rule-of-Law" fanfiction where the protagonists and antagonists live and interact in a society with a system of mostly reasonable laws and law enforcement. Definitely now categorized as Speculative Fiction.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 18 hours ago

Lol I see all those "honor codes" in movies and TV and I'm like... why doesn't the villian just ignore it? Like... just sneak attack against the protagonist, fuck the rules lol. If they are dead, there's no one to report you for breaking the rules anyways.

🤣

[–] [email protected] 1 points 13 hours ago

That's seems pretty meaningful

Although I here constitutional rights have fallen out of favor for the last few decades.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Ive been wondering what the difference is between an executive that ignores court orders and acts counter to congressional laws and martial law.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 18 hours ago

Martial law would probably allow stricter control of the internet... so Americans like me probably wouldn't be able to use Lemmy.

(And I'd probably also end up getting summarily executed by the American Gestapo/SS, since... I'm not white... 😖)

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

Martial law generally has legal mechanisms in place to provide some limitations to duration etc.

In other words, it would be an improvement over what is currently happening.

[–] felixwhynot 2 points 1 day ago

Amount of police/national guard troops, maybe?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Something serious is being implied here.... Not sure what to make of it tho🤔

[–] surewhynotlem 19 points 1 day ago

That the concept of three branches of government keeping each other in check fails miserably when one branch has no way to constrain the other, or willingly abdicates their responsibility.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago

Those among them lacking in morals would make bank (or influence, whatever is afforded to them) justifying that government's actions according to US constitutional law.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And most of them will be millionaires by 2029

[–] idiomaddict 4 points 1 day ago

I worry they’ll be trillionaires and everyone else will be the millionaires, carting our wheelbarrows full of useless dollars around

[–] thenextguy 0 points 1 day ago