this post was submitted on 20 Mar 2025
757 points (99.3% liked)

196

2683 readers
2871 users here now

Community Rules

You must post before you leave

Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).

Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.

Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.

Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".

Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.

Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.

Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.

Avoid AI generated content.

Avoid misinformation.

Avoid incomprehensible posts.

No threats or personal attacks.

No spam.

Moderator Guidelines

Moderator Guidelines

  • Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
  • Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
  • When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
  • Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
  • Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
  • Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
  • Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
  • Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
  • Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
  • Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
  • Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
  • Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
  • First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
  • Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
  • No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
  • Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
  • Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.

founded 2 months ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Potatar 24 points 15 hours ago

This is some Ceci n'est pas une pipe shit

[–] bitjunkie 14 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

Shitty Skynet doesn't realize it's teaching us how to hide from it

[–] [email protected] 8 points 12 hours ago

The furries will be saved

[–] [email protected] 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Agent641 2 points 11 hours ago

I look forward to being issued with my tactical combat fursuit

[–] BigBenis 21 points 16 hours ago

"Don't think about elephants"

[–] Agent641 21 points 17 hours ago

I don't get it, it's just a picture of some static?

[–] [email protected] 16 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Why wouldn't you want a dog in your static? Why are you a horrible person?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 hours ago

poor AI just wanted to draw some puppies

[–] [email protected] 32 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

That's human-like intelligence at its finest. I am not being sarcastic, hear me out. If you told a person to give you 10 numbers at random, they can't. Everyone thinks randomness is easy, but it isn't ( see: random.org )

So, of course a GPT model would fail at this task, I love that they do fail and the dog looks so cute!!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (5 children)

I mean, here's a few random numbers out of my head: 1 9 5 2 6 8 6 3 4 0. I don't get it, why is it supposed to be hard? Sure, they're not "truly" random, but they sure look random /:

[–] Ultraviolet 31 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

You have one of each number except 7, and you're deliberately avoiding doubles and runs of consecutive numbers. Human attempts at randomness tend to be very idealized in that way, and as a result, less random.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

They may look random but arent truly random. Computers are terrible at it too. Thats why cryptography requires external sources to generate "true" random numbers. For example, cloudflare uses a wall of lava lamps to generate randomness for encryption keys.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 13 hours ago

That's so cool.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 16 hours ago (4 children)

If you're not joking, the fact you have no repetition/duplicates of numbers is a pattern that would make it easy to start to predict next number. Numberphile has nice demonstration of how predictable human randomness is, it's in the first 3 minutes of the video.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I've got some more random numbers:

8 6 7 5 3 0 9 1 1 2 3 5 8 1 2 4 8 1 6 3 2

It's not that they look random is enough - They need to BE random.

Recheck your lava lamp Wall of Entropy and generate some real rands, scrub. (/s)

[–] [email protected] 5 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

Here's another set of random digits

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

:3

After all, there's no fundamental reason for why it can't all just be a repeat of the same number. But it doesn't look random, right? So what is randomness?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 hours ago

There are 10 trillion ways to combine a sequence that long, so I think you would expect to see that exact sequence every 10 trillion digits of a randomly generated decimal sequence on average, which isn't that many to a modern computer, so almost certainly that has already happened by pure accident.

And randomness can be defined as entropy, which you check statistically. You can never be certain, you can only increase your level of confidence. Here is how random.org does it:

https://www.random.org/analysis/

And this shows you what some of those analyses look like in real time:

https://www.random.org/statistics/

[–] [email protected] 4 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

But where is the pink elephant?

[–] Agent641 3 points 11 hours ago

Why you gotta bring your mother into this?

[–] SkunkWorkz 24 points 21 hours ago

ChatGPT: “don’t generate a dog, don’t generate a dog, don’t generate a dog”

Generates a dog.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 23 hours ago

I used to use Google assistant to spell words I couldn't remember the spelling of in my English classes (without looking at my phone) so the students could also hear the spelling out loud in a voice other than mine.

Me: "Hey Google, how do you spell millennium?" GA: "Millennium is spelled M-I-L-L-E-N-N-I-U-M."

Now, I ask Gemini: "Hey Google, how do you spell millennium." Gemini: "Millennium".

Utterly useless.

[–] isyasad 204 points 1 day ago (4 children)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 16 hours ago

lmfaao, ai tryna gaslight

[–] [email protected] 54 points 1 day ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

Wow. I ABSOLUTLY saw an image of a dog in the middle. Our brain sure is fascinating sometimes.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"want me to try again with even more randomized noise?" literally makes no sense if it had generated what you asked (which the chatbot thinks it did)

[–] [email protected] 16 points 16 hours ago

Remember, "AI" (autocomplete idiocy) doesn't know what sense is; it just continues words and displays what may seem to address at least some of the topic with no innate understanding of accuracy or truth.

Never forget that ChatGPT 2.0 can literally be run in a giant Excel spreadsheet with no other program needed. It's not "smart" and is ultimately millions of formulae at work.

[–] cryptiod137 180 points 1 day ago

Get gaslit idiot

load more comments
view more: next ›