this post was submitted on 16 Mar 2025
543 points (99.1% liked)

World News

44542 readers
2827 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

US President Donald Trump has signed an order to strip back the federally-funded news organisation Voice of America, accusing it of being "anti-Trump" and "radical".

A White House statement said the order would "ensure taxpayers are no longer on the hook for radical propaganda", and included quotes from politicians and right-wing media railing against the "leftist", "partisan" VOA.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 41 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Isn't Voice of America like the USA's equivalent of Deutsche Welle?

Basically a vehicle for internationally transporting news from the US American perspective?

Trump really hates any and all soft power the USA have available.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 6 days ago

Soft is a no-no word around Trump. He wants rock hard power, gay porn hard power.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Yes, it's one of the US's propaganda presses

[–] dantheclamman 0 points 6 days ago

They put out plenty of content about the US's flaws and failures

[–] pyre 4 points 6 days ago

yeah totally him and not some other dipshit trying to get back to superpower status.

[–] ToiletFlushShowerScream 27 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Sooo... Weakening US influence around the world in order for Putin to fill the vacuum? What is Trump's Russian codename again?

[–] AngryCommieKender 20 points 6 days ago
[–] Quadhammer 5 points 6 days ago

Pee tape kovnik

[–] CosmicCleric 2 points 6 days ago

Per CNN (per US Agency for Global Media), number of regular listeners, in millions, of VoA...

  • Indonesia 64.8
  • Nigeria 37.4
  • Mexico 37.1
  • India 29.1
  • Iran 12.2
  • Peru 11.9
  • Russia 10.1
  • Ukraine 9.8
  • Iraq 9.3
  • Egypt 9.0
[–] Sanctus 159 points 1 week ago (1 children)

How is everything that is "anti-Trump" radical? You fucking dictator.

[–] [email protected] 46 points 1 week ago

"If you smell shit everywhere you go it's probably because you're covered in it" Anon

[–] limonfiesta 147 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (13 children)

I don't understand the naysayers here.

This is hilarious. Trump wants to simultaneously expand the American empire, while he dismantles the tools of it that he's too stupid to understand the importance of.

No matter their mission statement, or any tangible benefits they might have provided, both USAID and VOA, were tools of empire. These aren't mutually exclusive concepts.

[–] AutistoMephisto 3 points 6 days ago

See, the thing is, those tools of empire were government-funded. Congress allocated money and resources to those tools for them to do their jobs. The intent is to eventually replace those with privately owned, profit-motivated alternatives. Why do you think they cut NOAA and NWS funding and fired all their probies? So that private companies can fill the void. Then if you want life-saving weather information in the event of a tornado or hurricane, pay a monthly subscription fee to some billionaire's weather/disaster alert service.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

This isn't fundamentally changing anything. It's about using different tools for the same goal.

[–] limonfiesta 12 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

America cannot dominate the world militarily, nor could that even serve the goals of its contemporary brand of neoimperialism.

Soft power i.e. culture, propaganda, and diplomatic/idealogical relationships, are the foundation upon which it's built.

Yes, military hard power plays a critical role, but it cannot replace soft power.

This isn't empire for the sake of raw nationalism, and nothing would accelerate the American collapse faster than dismantling the state's soft power tools. The end result will be attempts to maintain power by spending its military resources on peer, or near peer conflicts.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 days ago

In Trump's brain, soft power isn't properly deferential to him personally. That's what it amounts to.

It all comes down to his raging narcissism; soft power is done with tact and diplomacy in whispers. For Trump, that's weakness. It's not true power unless people/countries/organizations proclaim his power with effusive thank-yous and obsequious shows of capitulation.

It's not enough to lead the free world; the rest of the world needs to be properly thankful for it in a way that he himself finds acceptable. (namely by making a big show of bending the knee)

[–] [email protected] -2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

It's not really about changing it for cold hard power, but changing how their soft power will be projected. I've seen some theories that the rethoric is going to change from being about freedom of expression and LGBT rights and similar to ideas about traditional family values or something, and I think it's very plausible.

[–] limonfiesta 8 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

...and how will that be disseminated? That's what organizations like VOA and USAID were for.

Trump has the capacity to destroy organizations, but I find it doubtful he could recreate them out of whole cloth.

That's my point.

[–] AutistoMephisto 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

He can't recreate them out of whole cloth, you're right. But he's got friends who could. They have the capital, they have the manpower, they have the brainpower, and could easily leverage all of that to creating privately owned alternatives, paving the way for Curtis Yarvin's world to exist. America as we know it would be dead and replaced with hundreds, if not thousands, of small city-states owned and controlled by corporations, whose executive boards would have absolute free reign to control. If you've ever played BioShock, it would be akin to a bunch of Raptures, but on dry land.

Yarvin posits it as a collection of corporate city-states that would compete for citizens like corporations compete for customers. If you don't like the oppression going on in your current city-state, you can simply move to another one and join it.(Nevermind that the corporate oligarch running your current city-state could write policy forbidding you to leave, or placing conditions on your emigration, such as taking all your money.) There's also some crypto nonsense about how borders wouldn't exist because you can be a citizen of one of those "network states" without ever having visited simply by logging in and signing up like you could for a social network. (Nevermind that the corporate oligarch running your current city-state might have beef with the oligarch of the state you wish to join and could restrict access to their network.)

[–] [email protected] 79 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Trump's mission is to weaken the US, NATO, and the EU. Eliminating VoA helps do that. Notice how he isn't threatening China with invasion, but Canada and Denmark instead.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] JacksonLamb 40 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Trump doesn't want to expand the American empire though. He makes noises about it, but words are cheap. Judging by his actions he wants to create chaos so oligarchs can profit.

The ultrawealthy have no national allegience.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] ninjabard 62 points 1 week ago (3 children)

As an American, I would like to apologize that the idiots of this country re-elected Mango Mussolini. And I'm sorry that the rest of the world has to suffer because of this idiot and his cronies.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

You don't have to self-identify as "American" if you don't want. You don't need to apologize for a system over which you have virtually no control. The first step to resisting an evil system is probably disavowal.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_religion

[–] 0li0li 40 points 1 week ago (8 children)

Waiting for you guys to actually use your second amendment.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 58 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Under $300 million a year to spread US propaganda to over 300 million people. That's a fucking bargain man.

This is going to give up so, SO much soft power because of a snowflake's ego. This is a bad deal.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 45 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It must also be weird for the sycophants who he just nominated to staff it too.

The equivalent of "Daddy got you a pink convertible and you get three minutes to drive it before the repo guy comes"

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›