It’s been fun. Once this is official I guess it’s over for me.
this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2025
309 points (100.0% liked)
Privacy
35371 readers
597 users here now
A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.
Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.
In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.
Some Rules
- Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
- Don't promote proprietary software
- Try to keep things on topic
- If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
- Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
- Be nice :)
Related communities
much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
Jokes on them i've been cheating on this game with my location as some random places for a decade and lot of people have been doing this too.
OK so instead of tracking journalists with NSO spyware and murdering them,
they won't even have to install NSO anymore.
prepare to see news reports of many more mysterious murders, and obvious assassinations.
Next up, Saudi Arabia buys the Samsung Galaxy and Google Pixel smartphone lines. Pokemon Go comes installed in the system partition for free with 1000 free PokeCoins, how generous!
and then absolutely everyone I talk to will do usual 'oh it's not that bad , you're over reacting' with the additional "I don't use it but I still have it installed"
My mom: "hey honey how do I uninstall this Pokeman Go app? The uninstall button is greyed out. It's using 20% of my storage and battery"
Too much detail. Needs more jpg
I don’t see as any worse, necessarily. For all I know, Saudi Arabia was previously buying the data from Niantic piecemeal.
Forbes, 2016: How Niantic Is Profiting Off Tracking Where You Go While Playing 'Pokémon GO'
While true, I felt (if misguided) more comfortable with my data under California data protection laws than Saudi Arabia.
As a European, I never feel comfortable with my data under any US state's data protection laws.
Yeah, but we can't have real data privacy laws in the US. Won't you think of the shareholders?
They've gotten rich off of spying on you wholesale and selling the information to anybody with cash.
It would be rude and un-American to ask them to stop profiting off of morally bankrupt practices. Plus, they'd just say no and they own the government too.
Pikmin Bloom too
Booooo. That sucks.
I was never into Pokemon before this app but this game was fun just finding new discoveries even in my own city.
Luckily geocaching is still a thing!
Too bad it is $30/year for the app to work.
Geocaching isn't limited to a single app... Go find a geocaching website and punch the coords into whatever mapping app you use.
Now that sounds like the perfect replacement for Pokémon Go for me, which means it's an app I'll install as a way to motivate me to go walk outside and then feel guilty because I just don't.
I can't believe Saudi Arabia are nationalising Pokemon Go when the UK won't even nationalise regional water monopolies. Honestly these things were never great for privacy and given the state of things I'm not sure I'm more concerned about a Saudi entity tracking me than a US one.
Not good news for gay Pokemon fans in that country though.
Gotta catch them all!
In the end all that changes is a Saudi company on NSA checks instead of a US one.
Business ethics? Meh, just profits, just profits.
Unregulated Capitalism.
Always has been, and nothing will continue to be done about it.
F
Waiting for them to further push monetization schemes. I'll bet on stat boosters and shiny rate enhancers for $$.
First they came for my event pikachus, then they came for my shiny legendaries...
Saudi Arabia really likes to invest in dead tech.
They don't care about the tech, they care about the data.
You give them too much credit on this one. This decision was likely spearheaded by some nepo appointment who is out to diversify in the worst way. When your send cousin Johnny to college in the West, you're still not getting the best and brightest when he comes back. Whole structure of their investment fund is graft and bad decisions.
Compare Saudis system to Norway's sovereign fund. Instead of being politically neutral, like everything in the house of Saud it's a patronage system. They do big headline buys like this to convince everybody above them they're actually doing something to diversify from oil market shocks. But in this case they're buying a dry well that's already had it's data sold to those who wanted it and is burdened to IP licensing that likely drains much of its micro transaction potential. They're not going to get much from a state security standpoint from it that they couldn't get in ways that would cost several billion less and they're not going to get much of a return of investment on it either. But since patronage rewards are front loaded they do stupid buys like this.
If they just wanted the data, they could've gotten it for much less than 3.8 billion. They likely could've gotten it for 3.7 billion less at least.