If agreed, how will Russia use those 30 days. How will Europe and Ukraine?
politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
Russia will use it to rearm and plan for a new attack, certainly. That's why I think it's a gift for them. Ukraine had better do the same, because the track record of Putin says this ain't gonna hold.
Could you imagine if Russia violates this ceasefire too? The propaganda....
They will, but under the guise of a false flag to state that Ukraine broke the ceasefire first.
If it happens and Ukraine and its true allies use the time wisely to prepare for the worst case, then the worst case might not be so bad.
Ukraine isn't recovering much territory militarily anytime soon, short of a black swan event. So diplomacy and putin's "retirement" will be the way.
trump will screw it up with premature sanctions relief though.
Zelenskyy agreed but Russia’s response has yet to come.
I disagree with OP, this ain’t a gift to Russia.
Ukrainian troops have been operationally encircled at Kursk with the only road out being under Russian fire control, Russian VVS has air above Kursk region under their control, and unconfirmed reports state that a possible coup is brewing within Ukrainian army because of Zelenskyy’s and Syrskyi‘s hubris in conducting Kursk offensive. Russia’s Operation Potok in Kursk region led to a detachment of Russian troops entering the rear of Ukrainian forces through an inactive gas pipeline resulting in weakening of the Ukrainian group at the area of the city of Sudzha and some Ukrainian troops being effectively encircled in Ivashkovskii.
As Ukraine sent its most elite units into Kursk region, the destruction of Ukrainian forces in Kursk region would be very detrimental and without guns targeting the road going silent, escape is unlikely.
Given the above, a ceasefire assuming it allows a withdraw, can be temporarily life saving for Ukraine.
I might have a pro-Russia bias, but I believe that this ceasefire would benefit Ukraine in the war effort assuming they can use it to withdraw units from Kursk region.
I might have a pro-Russia bias
If you do, you have zero credibility.
Believe what you want.
I agree. This also puts Putin under pressure because not agreeing after Ukraine already has would make him look bloodthirsty even to his supporters.
because not agreeing after Ukraine already has would make him look bloodthirsty
Anyone who doesn't already see what Putin is, is a fool or a liar.
Or extremely misinformed
I don't think this puts Putin under any pressure. If anything there's a lot of people who are going to criticize him if he accepts another temporary ceasefire that allows Ukraine to rearm
Russia could use that time to rearm too. Don't assume their logistics are in great shape.
Not unlikely either. Russia has been drilling and preparing troops for a river crossing alongside bringing in additional supplies unlikely to be part of the Dnieper island campaign but instead preparing a crossing of the Dnieper and they had captured land near the Kherson bridge.
Without the Ukrainian attacks on say Russian command posts in Kherson Oblast like what happened on March 5, these preparations would likely be easier.