this post was submitted on 10 Mar 2025
821 points (98.5% liked)

Leopards Ate My Face

5221 readers
1423 users here now

Rules:

Also feel free to check out [email protected] (also active).

Icon credit C. Brück on Wikimedia Commons.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

What era in time do these people think R's are trying to conserve to, after or before civil rights?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] leadore 8 points 53 minutes ago* (last edited 52 minutes ago)

doing this will only push me and other people like me out!

That's the point. Next, to the camps for you.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 30 minutes ago

This asshole will be trying to explain to the guards that he voted for Trump and not like these groomers as he's loaded onto the next bus headed for the camps.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 22 minutes ago

I wonder if Jordan Ramsey is good at cooking.

[–] MehBlah 9 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

Its Regression not conservatism. Quit calling it that. There is nothing wrong with a conservative outlook. The maga don't have a conservative outlook. They have a regressive one.

[–] SoftestSapphic 2 points 7 minutes ago

Real question, how can someone be conservative while still supporting progress? Doesn't the entire ideology hinge on things never changing?

[–] trashgirlfriend 5 points 56 minutes ago

They don't know they're the same picture

[–] SolidShake 2 points 48 minutes ago (1 children)

whats funny to me is this guy is gay and is openly admitting to being pro life and in favor of the 2nd amendment. making him fully 100% liberal. yet he doesn't like liberals lmao. it always amazes me that people don't know the literal definition of what a liberal is.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 47 minutes ago (1 children)

Wouldn't a liberal be pro choice ?

[–] SolidShake 1 points 14 minutes ago* (last edited 13 minutes ago)

generally yes...but a liberal has the freedom to be open about whatever they want. they aren't forced to feel one way or the other. Like. "if you are pro choice then you will go to jail" and someone saying "im pro life because i dont want to go to jail" that is not being liberal, that is following a structure

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 hour ago

Hard r voters when they realise where their party wants to go back to

[–] hark 16 points 3 hours ago

"When i vote R, i didn't think" sums it up nicely.

[–] prime_number_314159 11 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Same sex marriage was such a good example of democracy working. MA stood alone, defiant and proud, for years. Then some of the neighboring states went "You know what? They didn't get smote with fire and brimstone. Maybe I can do that too."

Only 10 years after Massachusetts took the first step, it was growing past the recently blue states as voters came around to accepting it, and if it had another 5 years, we would've been taking would-be holdouts like Texas.

That process was cut short, but I haven't seen any polling that suggests we're not still collectively sliding that direction, so even if the supreme court reverses Obergefell v. Hodges, I don't think there's popular support for bans this time.

[–] captainlezbian 7 points 3 hours ago

But they already exist. My state constitution has a prohibition on recognition of gay marriages. These laws won't stay nullified and have to be reestablished. And much like we see with abortion they're going to next go for a nationwide ban.

[–] captainlezbian 25 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Oh hey I've met these guys. They're not well liked by their fellow gays

[–] Hobo 18 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

They’re not well liked.

I think that probably would've sufficed. Even the Republicans shun gay Republicans because they don't want them to exist. Gay Republicans are like the most baffling thing to me. Like a Jewish Nazi.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

There were always Jewish Nazis, or at least enablers. They're called Kapo, which is one of the most insulting words a Jew can call another. When Bergen-Belsen was liberated, the prisoners turned on the Kapos, and lynched 170 of them on the spot.

One of HitlerPig's closest and most loyal advisors is one: Kapo Stephen "PeeWee Himmler" Miller.

Perhaps we should extend the meaning to include gay Republicans, or at least gay MAGAs.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 hours ago

Gay people can be gullible and naive too. Nobody said they were perfect.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 hours ago

im glad the republican party stuck to it's roots-punishing the slavers, racial equality, and being lead by a bisexual wrestler who flirts and jokes with karl marx in his free time. the past 160 or so years could've been pretty rough if they hadn't.

[–] LucidLyes 15 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

They claimed to accept black people way before you, and they didn't (look at the sieg heils and white supremacy claims). They only pretended to accept gay people recently, and you thought this was serious?

[–] T00l_shed 21 points 4 hours ago

Time to break out ol' trusty.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 hours ago

"It's not the same republican party it used to be, get over it!"

It has always been that party, idiot.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 hours ago

What a ridiculous level of privilege coming from this completely oblivious meal for the leopards

[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 hours ago

This will be the first guy to leave Republicans for being anti-gay. Alone in a sea of sieg-heiling nazis that shaved their heads because of feminist criticism of videogames.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 hours ago

What a dumb ass. What world was he living in… I can tell you it wasn’t reality.

[–] MataVatnik 1 points 3 hours ago

Brain damage

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 hours ago

Chanting 1776 wasn't a dead giveaway?!

[–] atempuser23 39 points 13 hours ago

Oh man that's the stuff. That man is actually opening the leopards mouth and placing his face right in.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 12 hours ago

"But im a good Jew, I'll happily walk to my death voluntarily"

[–] [email protected] 55 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

I'm also pro 2nd Amendment, but I'm not a stupid single issue voter, democracy is more important than guns lol.

Also, when the fuck was trump ever "pro 2nd amendment"

Remember: "Take their guns first, due process later"

Why do right-wingers think this guy is "pro 2nd amendment"? 🤣

[–] [email protected] 0 points 35 minutes ago

Im pro 2ndA Democrat as well but this who thing is pretty damning proof that there is no need for guns because we Wouldn't use them anyways.

But damn guns are fun to shoot... But im not sure the pros outweigh the cons anymore since the biggest pro seems to be a lie and the biggest con is how many of us die needlessly to them.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I am pro second amendment. I believe the constitution explicitly grants the states the right to regulate militias.

[–] Tillman 14 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

Fun facts: The 2nd amendment was created before bullets let alone bump stocks. Kamala was a gun owner. Trump isn’t allowed to own one because he’s a convicted rapist.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 hours ago

It's because he's a convicted felon. The rape thing was in civil court.

[–] jj4211 2 points 4 hours ago

Not just before bullets and rifling, but firearms were single shot muzzle loaded.

load more comments
view more: next ›