this post was submitted on 03 Mar 2025
76 points (97.5% liked)

Europe

3063 readers
2347 users here now

News and information from Europe πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡Ί

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in [email protected]. (They're cool, you should subscribe there too!)
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)

(This list may get expanded when necessary.)

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the mods: @[email protected], @[email protected], or @[email protected].

founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
 

Edit: I meant to leave this empty to start, but to clarify now that there's other discussion:

"Access to minerals" doesn't necessarily mean "discounted" or "mineral rights". It could be a deal consisting of:

  1. Military aid goes to EU defence industry supplies
  2. In exchange, EU gets first dibs at market rate contracts (with some tax-exempt on on the EU side for imports to make it more appealing to take advantage of on both sides) for metals/mineral extraction.

This could help spur Ukraine's post-war economy, integration with EU markets, and benefit the EU defence industry. It would also demonstrate what a real and fair deal looks like.

top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CosmoNova 21 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I completely disagree because Ukraine is at a huge disadvantage to make any deals right now. They defend our borders too and need support regardless. So unless they offer a deal, we shouldnβ€˜t even think about it.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 days ago

Any deal starting with a clause about minerals will sound like extortion. I'm not against a mineral deal, but first things first: Security.

Once a viable security deal (with enforcement) has been reached, I'm sure a mineral deal will happen naturally.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 days ago

As a member of the EU and a European Defense Alliance, Ukraine could bring its minerals and a lot of material and immaterial resources I guess.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Why do you want us to stoop to Trump's level?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago (2 children)

If done how OP proposes, this isn’t really taking advantage of Ukraine at all.

It’s mostly just forming a strategic partnership and making sure EU companies are financially invested in Ukraine which will result in political pressure for lasting peace and EU aid.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If done how OP proposes, this isn’t really taking advantage of Ukraine at all.

Yeah, he add additional info after my comment (was just the title before).

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

My focus is also on delegitimizing bullshit deal proposals with something fair :)

[–] Xeroxchasechase 9 points 2 days ago

Either way it sounds like an extortion and protection mony for me.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

There are two countries in eu that has troops to deploy: france and uk. The rest of us have defence forces only

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Where would military equipment to rival the one from the US come from?

Edit: Did a quick search on the largest military manufactors and out of the top 10, 1 is English, 3 are Chinese and the remaining 6 are American, so none are European.

If the US decides that Europe can't buy equipment they are in a good position to do so.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 days ago (2 children)

There are some relevant european defense contractors. Maybe not in the Top 10 worldwide, but we do have a capable defense industry here.

  • #13 Leonardo (italy)
  • #14 Airbus
  • #17 Thales Group (france)
  • #23 Dassault
  • #26 Rheinmetall
[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Revenue means jack shit, for the most part US gear buys US favour, on the ground, it's pretty shit despite being stupidly expensive. I'll take a Grippen or Stridsvagn every day of the week. Also, with the rearmament, all of these companies will grow substantially.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This is basically what I was thinking. "Access to minerals" doesn't necessarily "access without market cost". It could be a deal consisting of:

  1. Military aid goes to EU defence industry supplies
  2. In exchange, EU gets first dibs at market rate contracts (with some tax-exempt on on the EU side for imports) for metals/mineral extraction
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

I think what Ukraine needs most is a stable and secure environment. Nobodly wants to invest in an area where there could be war next month.

[–] khannie 3 points 1 day ago

Where would military equipment to rival the one from the US come from?

We don't have it yet. Absolutely no question. Not really sure why folks are arguing otherwise.

Russian capacity to produce military equipment far outstrips Europe. EU have been pumping grant money into building capacity since 2022 but I'm not sure how far it's come.

How we're not on a war footing since the invasion and especially since it became clear that at best the US election was a toss up I will never understand.