this post was submitted on 02 Mar 2025
54 points (96.6% liked)

No Stupid Questions

37665 readers
2149 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I guess what I'm essentially asking here is wether you mind seeing the same post several times in your feed? I've done it in the past, but also tend to feel that duplicate posts are a bit annoying.

top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ccunning 38 points 1 day ago (2 children)

My personal opinion is to pick the top two or three most applicable communities and post there.

As someone who primarily browses Local or All, after seeing the third identical post it starts looking like spam.

[–] drmoose 3 points 17 hours ago

This is an easily solvable problem if the front end could just group posts with the same link

[–] Rhynoplaz 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I second this. If I see the same question twice in two different communities, I don't see that as a problem, and if I think it's an interesting conversation starter, I'll probably look at both posts, to see all the different comments.

Three feels like the limit. Any more than that is just obnoxious.

[–] Dran_Arcana 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Lemmy needs some sort of built-in way to merge them. That'd be the best solution I think. Then you could just pick a list of relevant communities and it'd be pretty seamless

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think the crossposting feature lemmy has effectively does this, but I'm not sure

[–] Dran_Arcana 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's about halfway there I think, they still show up separately in clients and have separate comments threads.

[–] ApollosArrow 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Correct. It does not funnel all the conversation into the same post, which is probably most people’s preference.

[–] Dran_Arcana 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Oh weird, I would not have expected to be in the minority there

[–] ccunning 2 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

For me it’s easy to imagine an article being linked to two communities that are going to have drastically different takes.

[email protected] and [email protected] for example.

Now I can see wanting to have a discussion across both communities, but I can also see /c/cars wanting discuss cars without having every conversation devolve into an argument or admonishment.

As I was writing this another problem came to mind. You have a pooled discussion across two or more communities with two or more moderation policies. How could that be reconciled?

[–] Dran_Arcana 2 points 16 hours ago

I think you've convinced me that it's a slightly more complicated problem than I initially gave it credit for; thank you for that!

I think you could solve for the disparate community theme problem by also requiring title match for mergers. You could probably also solve for it by having a 2-way merger whitelist on links. E.g community A and B both maintain lists of "similar" communities and then if A's list contains B and vice-versa they would merge.

Comment moderation I got nothing though. That's a tough one.

[–] BigMikeInAustin 6 points 1 day ago

Readers are also looking in related communities.

This also fragments any discussion.

At that point, it feels more like you're spam-pushing an opinion rather than trying to have a discussion.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago

Lemmy is small right now, everyone will see the post if you post it once.

The only time it makes sense to do a cross post, is when two communities are diametrically opposed, and they would need safe spaces to talk amongst themselves. Like religion community, or a diet community etc

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] itsAsin 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

i have been on lemmy since the reddit exodus and use it every day... even post from time to time and i have no confidence at all about what cross-post means, or how to carry it out, or what the results look like.

i am sure that it's very simple, but...?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What client do you use? There's a cross post button on every post, which lets you post it to another community, but linking back to the original post.

[–] itsAsin 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

thanks. i took a moment to find it (boost). but it now leads me back to the OP question...

if a crosspost came up during my lemmy scroll, it will probably look exactly the same as if i had made the post to each community individually. so is crossposting a meaningful alternative?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

Well, its convienient, and it links back to the original post.

[–] slazer2au 7 points 1 day ago

Pick one, then use the Crosspost feature to link them all together.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Not making multispam globally against the rules is one of the biggest mistakes in Lemmy and is close to making it unusable.

[–] drmoose 1 points 17 hours ago

Oh no you might see something twice - unusable!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Pick two communities.

Probably a “more accurate but less popular” community and a “less accurate but more popular” community.

Post in the “more accurate but less popular” one. Cross-post that to the “less accurate but more popular” one.

PS: Given your name, I’d expect you to have an opinion already.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 hours ago

Given your name, I’d expect you to have an opinion already.

I do but in this case my opinion doesn't matter if the masses feel differently.