this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2025
254 points (94.4% liked)

World News

41236 readers
3373 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 hours ago

There's no discussion. Fuck off or declare war

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

So stop discussing it. Dumb mfers take the bait every time.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I'm so sick of this bullshit. No. Stop talking about it.

[–] doodledup 8 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

He never actually meant it. Why does nobody get it? It's a distraction. Stop fuelling it. This headline is exactly what Trump wants.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Anchoring is legitimately a negotiation technique where you start with an absurd demand to set the framing of the haggling.

Ie now the idea of expanded sea port security integration doesn't seem like a crazy thing to exchange for elimination of tariffs.

But guess what, expanded sea port security integration would drastically reduce our ability to economically pivot in the face of future tariff threats. Ie if expanded sea port security integration means the USA can prevent us from using our sea ports.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Should probably include the periods in i.e.

I'm guessing you're on a phone.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

You don’t know that, and Project 2025 states that foreign affairs must be subject to national interests. The GOP is prioritizing access to strategic minerals as a long term goal. DT has stated the annex desire repeatedly and consistently.

At the least, the economic assault is not a distraction, and it is obviously the initial stage in an escalation. People are already affected, and pissed.

[–] homesweethomeMrL 34 points 17 hours ago

Why would anyone think twice about this ridiculous word fart from a demented rapist?

Move on, nothing to see here.

[–] Carmakazi 68 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

A lot of these hypotheticals can be answered by "we'll just slaughter anyone who makes a fuss" because that's where our country's moral framework will be if we ever march troops across the border. Like an ultra nationalist fascist state is going to concern itself with old treaties and popular sentiments.

[–] PlaidBaron 37 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (8 children)

From a Canadian prespective, we would commit all the war crimes we could against an invading force, especially one we could not fight a conventional war against and win.

Im talking sending American GIs home in unrecognizable condition.

I dont care what government is in power by then. Invade Canada and be prepared to die in horrible ways, mutilated, and sent back to your loved ones in chunks.

This is the only way we could win a war against the US and we would not hesitate to do it.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

I've noticed this bluster among Canadians.

It's just bluster. I think surrendering is in your blood thanks to the French.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 23 minutes ago

Winning wars and then losing the occupation is in your very recent history.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

Realistically, we are so fucked. One single bomb on a highway or railway can completely decimate any one of our province's ability to move people or goods and perform services. Our border is too long and wild to be defendable. And they could probably take out our entire military logistics in a single night of bombings. All of this isn't even to mention that if they wanted to go all out insane they could make nuclear threats if the Canadian government doesn’t capitulate. I'm not saying we couldn't resist once occupied, it's just fucking hideous to think about.

[–] PlaidBaron 7 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Im referring to resistance. We dont stand a chance in a regular engagement.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

Yeah, no. There will be no "canadian resistance."

Lol. Anyone who tries to form some resistance will be charged with terrorism and made an example of.

You're all bark and no bite. Canadians would rather live as Americans than die as Canadians. It's just a fact of life.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 33 minutes ago* (last edited 33 minutes ago) (1 children)

I'm a dual citizen and I'd sooner burn my American passport. Americans who think like this can get fucked and suck Donnie's tiny fingers.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 14 hours ago

You shouldn't hesitate. And some USians would like to join you in eradicating the fascists.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 16 hours ago

The Geneva checklist

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 23 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

I vote for a trial where we test Canada taking the Western states.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 17 hours ago

...and the Northeast too, please.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

That would be cool, especially California, then we'd have somewhere warm to visit. LOL

[–] [email protected] 9 points 14 hours ago

Um… you can't take California without also taking us in Oregon and Washington with you!

[–] [email protected] 8 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

It's all about perspective...Live in Manitoba or Saskatchewan for awhile and virtually everywhere is warm to visit.

(Ok maybe I'm still a little salty about the -40 temps and my pipes freezing three times this winter.)

[–] [email protected] 5 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Hey even us 'soft' Torontonians had windchill at that temp several times this season. And snow, helluva lot this year too, almost like Buffalo. 😂

[–] [email protected] 4 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

The bonus is that kind of weather makes us appreciate the warmers days that much more.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 14 hours ago

It's why we can walk around in shorts when it's 8C (46F) outside.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 hours ago

Yet here you are discussing it.

[–] fiendishplan 30 points 20 hours ago (11 children)

What about going the other way, we take up the metric system and coins for our 1 and 2 dollars instead of paper bills?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

The U.S. already uses the metric system in strategic areas like the military, space exploration and scientific research.

It would be quite cost prohibitive to replace all the road signs so we’re keeping the imperial system for day to day stuff.

[–] bitchkat 2 points 9 hours ago

It's too bad they took away all the dual marked road signs when that dick Reagan killed the conversion to metric.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 19 hours ago (4 children)

The most disturbing part is that everyone is still discussing it.

You give him power by taking his mouth diarrhea as something more than just that.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

The cold, honest truth is that Trump needed a rival.

He's literally unrivaled because Bernie lost to hillary in the 2016 primary.

I blame everyone who voted for her in the primary for why we now have 2 trump presidencies. They would rather have Trump than reduce the disparity in wealth.

Greed won and entitlement won, again.

[–] Carmakazi 45 points 19 hours ago (4 children)

Enough of this. Nobody took him seriously in 2015 and we got what we got. You're not going to head him off by talking or not talking about him.

Trump does not have a sense of humor or a long-term tactical mindset. He speaks whatever is on his incomprehensibly selfish mind. When he says over and over and over again that he could run for a 3rd term, he means it. When he says over and over and over again that he thinks Canada should be annexed, he means it.

[–] robbinhood 13 points 16 hours ago

Thank you. It's just so f'ing baffling how many people still think the right approach to Trump is to underestimate, ignore, or otherwise write him off. We know what happens when we do that. This lesson has been taught to us time and time again and it's carried Trump to the White House twice.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›