this post was submitted on 19 Feb 2025
311 points (99.4% liked)

politics

20340 readers
3435 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez accused J.D. Vance of hypocrisy on free speech, citing Trump administration threats against lawmakers.

In a post on X, she said, "@JDVance, you lied to the world in Munich," referencing his claim that the U.S. values free speech.

She pointed to “border czar” Tom Homan’s push for a criminal probe into her immigrant rights webinar.

Vance, speaking in Munich, criticized European censorship, calling it election interference. AOC warned of authoritarian tactics aimed at silencing dissent.

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SinningStromgald 104 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Why does the DNC let spineless cowards like Jefferies and Schumer run the show instead of someone like AOC? Oh right, money.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

They simply want this. It's the only logical scenario at this point. We need to primary every single Democrat that accepts corporate money tbh.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago

Primary them out of a canon into the sun.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The DNC deliberately keeps a few token "progressives" to defang otherwise radical democrat constituents. People like AOC give working people the false hope that the DNC is shifting left and aren't entirely bought out by the owner class. No official of the Amerikkkan government will get us out of this mess.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What's your proof of the owner class keeping AOC as a token DNC member? AOC was duly elected in New York in a primary and election when her competitor massively outraised her campaign.

I agree that the DNC is very entrenched and it's not going to move left on its own, but it's really up to more progressives to launch Democratic campaigns across the country. I need evidence before I buy the idea that AOC asked for special permission from oligarchs/party seniors.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm not claiming that the owner class orchestrated her election in some clandestine way, or that AOC had to cozy up to special interests to win.

I'm claiming that AOC's presence in the DNC defangs otherwise radical working people, and the DNC use this to their advantage.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

That's at least a plausible idea... but still unlikely in my view. Realistically, if the DNC instead ostracized AOC and members like her from the party, would other organizations with enough national reach really form in its place? Maybe yes, maybe no if you asked me but it's not a given that it would.

[–] Beetschnapps 2 points 1 day ago

Yea I know, the first thing I think of when I hear a democrat say something good is “why do democrats suck so much?”

[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Stop, AOC, you're making them blush. This is their nature.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 day ago

Vance right now, "I feel like she really gets me, you know?"