this post was submitted on 14 Feb 2025
351 points (98.9% liked)

News

25613 readers
4022 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SLVRDRGN 171 points 2 weeks ago

So the censorship of "free" press begins.

[–] [email protected] 144 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The wire service has repeatedly signaled that it is preparing a legal challenge. As one AP staffer remarked on condition of anonymity, “It’s hard to come up with a clearer case of viewpoint discrimination.”

Good. I’m glad they’re not just going to silently accept this shit. The Associated Press is one of the most reliable and well respected news sources in the world. I’m hoping Trump’s hissyfit backfires tremendously.

[–] [email protected] 44 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Ah yes, a legal challenge against an administration that has proven they don’t care about the law and will do whatever they want with no consequences.

Short of direct action, nothing will come of this or any other lawsuit against them. Someone needs to remove the offenders from the field, period. Anything short of that is useless.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 2 weeks ago

Regardless, I like the message a lawsuit would send. Fucking with the press takes things to a new level.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 2 weeks ago

The current admin is largely following court orders at the moment

There is still a fight to be had. Don't just give up in advance

[–] witten 16 points 2 weeks ago

As much as direct action is fun, this is just a lie. Lawsuits have already changed the Trump administration's behaviour. Sure, they are still doing tons of illegal shit to see if they get called on it. But federal judges' rulings have called them on it and even served as effective push back in many cases.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago

It’s just how bureaucracy works. They have to tick each box.

[–] PattyMcB 106 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

How about that first amendment?

[–] [email protected] 57 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (4 children)

As the Trump stooge correctly states (broken clock, etc.)

“While their right to irresponsible and dishonest reporting is protected by the First Amendment, it does not ensure their privilege of unfettered access to limited spaces, like the Oval Office and Air Force One,” Budowich wrote.

[–] [email protected] 41 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It's basically the argument Bush, Reagan, and so on used for "Free Speech Zones."

It says nothing about your right to do it anywhere so they can force you into a zone a mile away from the RNC for your legal first amendment peotected protest.

Basically making it entirely meaningless.

This has been a long time coming.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 weeks ago

Exactly. I'd add that they have successfully made the law in general meaningless, so that even if it were in fact a 1A violation, nobody would or could do anything about it.

[–] Pavidus 19 points 2 weeks ago

You know, this is the kind of talk that should have been happening since before 2016. Everyone has warned that the constant barrage of lies and misinformation is dangerous.

However, they have the keys to the kingdom for round two now. The inaction of us (as a country) has let it get to this point. We're in for a wild ride.

[–] BrokenGlepnir 9 points 2 weeks ago

If they are going to punish a news organization for a perceived slight, then every other organization would be scared to report, make the press in fact not free

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Same as it ever was I guess, none of your rights really matter unless you can get in the right room with the right people.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 weeks ago

It's not Congress making a law and theyre not telling the AP they can't post anything. So they'll argue the first doesn't apply.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Yeah so about that...

The executive unitary theory, which the party in charge of all three branches of government right now subscribe to, essentially implies that the first amendment, and really the entire sheet of parchment, is about as useful as toilet paper.

"Congress shall not" doesn't mean shit when it's the executive calling the shots and the only institutions that can legally stop him are controlled by his loyal party.

At this point I'm almost hoping for some team of elite western-European mercenaries to come in and take over the capital and reboot democracy with updated firmware.

C'mon world. America has spent the past hundred-some-odd years spreading our democracy like a horny teenager. Can't someone repay the favor?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah, we need to be invaded.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Unfortunately this does not fall under that. They are still free to report things. They just don't get to report things second hand. He did the same shot during his first term.

[–] [email protected] 38 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

There it is! Trump attacks any trustworthy media outlet!

[–] glitch1985 37 points 2 weeks ago

Since they aren't privy to being in press briefings anymore they should just start reporting what they think happened. They can be the first to report Trump picked his nose after walking up to the podium or Leon was wearing a bright red skirt.

[–] PoopSpiderman 36 points 2 weeks ago

The presidential tantrum. It’s quite dignified.

[–] IzzyScissor 16 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Alternate title: TERFs suddenly demand people respect their chosen names

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

In what universe would these people be defined as "feminists"?

[–] IzzyScissor 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

You're absolutely right. It's hard for me to switch out of using 'TERF' because it offended them, but no one is even pretending to be a feminist anymore. I need to find a new shorthand name for "bigoted towards trans people specifically".

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

Transphobe?

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod 15 points 2 weeks ago

What absolute infants

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago

They're so SENSITIVE.