this post was submitted on 14 Feb 2025
291 points (98.7% liked)

News

25157 readers
5984 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 64 points 5 days ago (2 children)

now he can put his own loyalists in those positions to go after enemies of the ~~state~~diaper.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 5 days ago

These were his loyalists. He purged the career staff from leadership/management positions in these offices, and replaced them with people like these 6 prosecutors (conservative credentials like clerking for Scalia). The leadership in the Public Integrity Section got forced out (either resigned or got reassigned to an immigration task force), so the leaders who remained were specifically appointed by Trump.

The US Attorneys generally all resign upon a change of administration, unless asked to stay, and this Danielle Sassoon was appointed acting US Attorney by Trump. She's a conservative Republican.

[–] anon6789 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)

They were going to get fired anyway. It was already in the works. Resigning keeps their hands clean of this mess and likely protects them from some forms of retaliation. They've already been threatened to be investigated by their replacements. The US Attorney General is Trump's personal lawyer. There is no way these people would not have been booted.

This PBS article goes into the punishments they were looking at for sticking to their duty. OP's article goes more into why they were incorrect on not dropping charges despite the pressure being put on them.

The people who resigned weren't being weak. They were doing their duty to uphold the law, and they got thrown out. The resignations are just a F- you on their way out.

[–] ysjet 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

They were being weak. Republicans don't care, they're just happy that a spot opened up they can fill. They need to stop giving Republicans shit for free and make them fight for it, instead of just giving them our country.

[–] anon6789 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

They resisted the bad orders they were given, they publicly talked about the improper things they were being asked to do, they called out everyone doing it to them, and they said they had enough evidence to convict Adams of not only what he is currently charged with, but also had enough to bring new charges, despite possible evidence of him destroying more evidence.

To me it sounds they did what they could within boundries of the law, which they are there to uphold, up until the last moment they could. They're also pointing out that the charges have not been dropped, just put on hold and how that can be used to blackmail Adams into complying with more criminal acts.

What do you feel they should have done that they didn't do?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] anon6789 1 points 4 days ago

From what I can find, it seems that just brings more unnecessary hardship on themselves for no benefit to anyone.

Getting fired costs them their earned benefits, their unemployment benefits, insurance for them and their families, being fired makes it harder to get another federal position, and fighting it has legal costs they'd need to absorb. With people getting barred from their places of work, it doesn't seem to make sense to think they can't just lock you out when you go home anyway. With everyone above them being part of team Trump, they're just spiting themselves. They already spilled the beans on everyone.

They've put up more resistance than almost anyone else has so far. They're lawyers, not revolutionaries. Their responsibility is technically to be anything but revolutionary.

[–] [email protected] 53 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Is this the mayor who slandered Luigi and infringed his right to a fair trial?

[–] [email protected] 27 points 5 days ago

Yes, it is the former cop and "tough on crime" aka police attacks on racialized people mayor.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Why are they stepping down instead of making an actual stand and forcing their hand? Just making it easier for them. This is exactly what they want.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago

I agree. I understand if you're a meager little underling, but if you're in charge of investigating, then you need to take a stand and use the power you wield to stop or slow them down.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 days ago

Now make a law firm and get Luigi acquitted.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I wouldn’t blame anyone resigning voluntarily over this. Can you imagine the energy, dedication and countless hours they’d have put into building this case only to have it thrown away on a whim?! It would be close to impossible to stay motivated in any job after something like this. Honestly, good on them for prioritizing their safety and mental health over a thankless job.

This is how the Republicans are really gutting the government - by breaking the spirits of the most dedicated employees. This regime is going to be the biggest shock to US government since Reagan and the American people will be suffering from its impacts for decades.

[–] theparadox 2 points 4 days ago

thrown away on a whim?!

It wasn't thrown away on a whim, it was dismissed without prejudice. It was transformed into a gun held to the corrupt mayor's head so that the Trump administration can extract as much value as possible from him while he still has some power.

In my opinion, it's even more fucked up. Double corruption - corruption charges put on hold so that so the defendant can be extorted.

[–] Poxlox 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Link says it's not archived...

[–] gAlienLifeform 2 points 5 days ago