this post was submitted on 12 Feb 2025
408 points (95.7% liked)

politics

19954 readers
4882 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 48 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] taanegl 3 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I'm guessing they're doing it because A) they keep playing "the nice guy", B) they want a precedent for their next possible administration, or C) all of the above.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 hour ago

D) they are spineless cowards and don't want trump to put is crosshairs on them

[–] [email protected] 39 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

I get the sneaking suspicion that all the "but both parties are the same people" are going to end up kind of right -- but maybe not in the way they thought.

From my vantage point, there is only rich vs poor. Any other ideological divide either a) has been worsened by rich vs poor, or b) was invented to keep attention away from rich vs poor, à la divide and conquer.

[–] Bojack411 9 points 4 hours ago

Lol. "Kind of right". Rich vs poor. Yeah. Same thing dude. Most dems and Republicans get more money while in office. Not 2 times or 3 times. No hundreds of thousand or more. There are a few better than the rest but all of our politicians who can make waves are owned by an outside party with an agenda.

[–] Tillman 8 points 5 hours ago

OSCAR W. UNDERWOOD (Nov 8th, 1964) – Senator Underwood was a top contender for the Democrat presidential nomination in 1924. However, he obeyed his conscience by speaking out against the Ku Klux Klan, one of the Democrat Party’s most powerful forces.

His courageous stand cost him the presidential nomination and then his senate seat

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 hours ago

not a democracy, and that was so for long at this point

[–] [email protected] 56 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

Recall them all. Democrats refuse to learn and won’t step down, recalls are our best shot at getting non-corrupt representation.

[–] Quadhammer 5 points 6 hours ago

Wonder how that would work

[–] [email protected] 14 points 10 hours ago

I would love to see their reaction to that happening

[–] CharlesDarwin 6 points 6 hours ago

Christ, I'm just hearing that Curb Your Enthusiasm music all the time. Imagine a slow zoom on Schumer's goofy look up there along with....

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6MYAGyZlBY0

[–] [email protected] 22 points 8 hours ago

But we don't have the MAJORITY, everything is supposed to be THEIR FAULT!

IT'S IN THE PLAYBOOK!

[–] [email protected] 14 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

What horses do these morons think they're trading?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 hours ago

They're trading magic beans

[–] lennybird 24 points 9 hours ago

I'm only donating to progressives, notably AOC.

I've unsubbed from most Democratic lists.