this post was submitted on 10 Feb 2025
267 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19924 readers
3168 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 hours ago

If you were wondering what you would be doing when Hitler started building concentration camps and loading up the trains...you're doing it right now...

[–] [email protected] 11 points 5 hours ago

You don't need an offshore camp with nebulous legality for deporting immigrants. There's already somewhere to send them and you don't care if they go free. Pretty damn useful for domestic opponents though.

[–] disguy_ovahea 28 points 10 hours ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

I cant still understand how americans decided that putting up prisons and managing them should be privatised.

[–] disguy_ovahea 9 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

It began in the 1980s, when Republicans went full-throttle into privatization.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 hours ago

Really, it began it's current form when other slavery was outlawed, so states started capturing free slaves for "crimes" and leasing them out to their former owners. It's only a small evolution from there to today.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 hours ago

Americans didn't. A few rich ghouls did.

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer 10 points 9 hours ago

Damon T. Hininger still their CEO? Asking for a friend.

[–] someguy3 5 points 7 hours ago

Belle of the ranch pointed out it costs more at gitmo because you have to ship everyone and everything there.

[–] [email protected] 39 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Who else remembers past Presidents campaigning on closing Gitmo, then dropped the subject after getting elected?

[–] MolecularCactus1324 34 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

Obama signed an executive order to close it, but Congress and the legal system slowed it down.

[–] NarrativeBear 6 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

Where is congress and the legal system now?

[–] inclementimmigrant 19 points 9 hours ago

Oh come on you know damn well where it's at.

[–] chase_what_matters 6 points 8 hours ago

in the shitter

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Dashi 9 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

And what would have happened if he did it sooner? They would have kept stalling out out? I believe no matter when he did it out would have needed approval

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Then make them be the ones to block it from being shut down. Not try to do it right before leaving office.

And maybe not sign the bill to upgrade it...

https://www.courthousenews.com/obama-signs-bill-expanding-guantanamo/

Plus not like he even closed it with his closing EO

https://www.politico.com/story/2016/02/obama-gitmo-plan-reaction-219696

[–] Dashi 6 points 8 hours ago

That first article quotes Obama trying to close it. From the sounds of it congress attached keeping the base open as a rider to another defense funding bill. That's a common tactic I think