this post was submitted on 10 Feb 2025
54 points (87.5% liked)

politics

20340 readers
3985 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DaddleDew 60 points 1 week ago

Nobody wins a nuclear war. That's the whole point of it.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Someone just asked me the other day to provide evidence for my opinion that Musk was quickly going to pivot from "Mars" to ICBMs.

It was just an opinion but I guess I have my evidence now.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

His new brilliant plan? Instead of 5000 nuclear bombs, we'll just have one big one! The mother of all nukes launched inside a Starship.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Oh... Cool...
It just keeps getting worse every single day.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Nah.

My ideology will rise from the ashes.

Unironically. I'm a octopi supremacist posadist.

[–] distantsounds 20 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Try deescalating and reducing tensions by not pursuing land grabs? 🧐

[–] Jerb322 19 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer 13 points 1 week ago

Jigsaw: In front of you is a button that can launch over an dozen nuclear warheads. You have...

Elon: (smacks button)

Jigsaw: HOLY SHIT!!!

[–] just_another_person 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Literally all he'll be able to do on this front is reference 'War Games'.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Truly. The guy never really escaped the 80s.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 week ago

Pretty sure, we're all going to die now. Thanks Muskie Boy.

[–] ShittyBeatlesFCPres 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

No one wins a nuclear war. But also, this seems like a pipe dream. Israel’s Iron Dome is protecting a country the size of New Jersey against relatively unsophisticated missiles. I’m sure the Pentagon would love an American Iron Dome that can stop ICBMs but it would probably cost more than the entire world’s GDP just to cover the West Coast. And then it’d probably be obsolete before it was ever finished.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

ICBM defense especially for the US would have to be fundamentally different than the Iron Dome. Fewer emplacements covering a much larger area and capable of much greater target specificity. Of course it'd be obsolete at deployment and then you could update it as able.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

"SpaceX Nuclear Armageddon Live Stream" wasn't on my bingo card.

[–] SoftestSapphic 3 points 1 week ago

The rich are trying to achieve world domination before we collectively strip them of their excess wealth to fix wealth inequality and dethrone them.

I wish i were kidding...

Nothing will meaningfully improve until the rich fear for their lives