this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2025
41 points (91.8% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7612 readers
384 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Trump announced on Tuesday the US could "take over" the Gaza Strip and transform it into a premier tourist destination, or the "Riviera of the Middle East" - but without Palestinians.

On social media, many debated the plan, with large swathes of people denouncing it as "ethnic cleansing". Others immediately pointed out the US's long history of "settler colonialism" and "imperialism".

In the US, many liberal commentators, especially supporters of the Democratic Party, said Trump was acting precisely as they had warned ahead of presidential elections in November 2024. They blamed his Gaza takeover plan on Muslims for voting for him instead of Kamala Harris.

Voters in Michigan's Dearborn, the largest majority Arab-American city in the United States, overwhelmingly supported Trump in a clear protest against the Biden administration's handling of Israel's war on Gaza.

In reality, Trump won every swing state in the US election, and had he lost Michigan, Harris still would not have come close to competing in the electoral college.

all 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 31 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Dems will blame everyone but themselves. The people crave progressive, uplifting politics. Dems continue a center-right march into nothingness.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 3 weeks ago

a center-right march

I think the technical term for that is goose-step

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

The first people to blame are Trump voters. The percent of Trump voters who were whatever ethnicity, is pretty much the percent of that blame that they deserve. Fixating on Arab voters only - whether Trump, Harris, Stein, De la Cruz, whatever - is sick. Same principle goes for Dem voters - the second group to blame - who actively supported a genocidal candidate, at the expense of third party candidates who weren't gearing up for mass murder, or throwing the election to a mass murderer, or whatever BS Harris was up to.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

This comment section sure is spicy

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 weeks ago

Yep. This instance doesn't put up with the blue maga bullshit. It's refreshing.

[–] Doomsider 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Anything to do with .ml is. Trust me, they are just rude brigadiers who point fingers with no answers.

While I do agree with a lot of what they say they can't take any criticism at all. Their mods will stand by when their members abuse people and heavily censor when it is apparent their arguments are failing.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

first democrats dgaf about a genocide and derided people voting their conscience about it, calling them single issue voters; now their loved ones have to endure the inevitable next stage of a human rights violating cycle of history repeating itself and the democrats are once again denigrating them for it.

i took to calling democrats, blue maga, as a way to single out the hard core adherence to the inhumane red vs blue team tribalism that typifies american politics, but they're now literally espousing the same "fuck your feelings" mantra that exemplified trump's maga; they've TRULY become blue maga in every sense of the words and i suspect they'll be the ones in charge of the next election.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I think you're missing the n in dngaf at the top of your comment?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

My version is "don't give a fuck" and now I wonder if "don't" is technically 2 words. Lol

[–] Zahille7 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

It technically is. It's a contraction of "do" and "not"