Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.
I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!
It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.
Rules:
1. Be Respectful
Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.
Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.
...
2. No Illegal Content
Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.
That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals
-No CSA content or Revenge Porn
-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)
...
3. No Spam
Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.
-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.
-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.
-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers
-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.
...
4. No Porn/Explicit
Content
-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.
-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.
...
5. No Enciting Harassment,
Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts
-Do not Brigade other Communities
-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.
-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.
-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.
...
6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.
-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.
-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.
...
7. Content should match the theme of this community.
-Content should be Mildly infuriating.
-The Community !actuallyinfuriating has been born so that's where you should post the big stuff.
...
8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.
-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.
...
...
Also check out:
Partnered Communities:
Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.
All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.
I was watching the RFK Jr questioning today and when Bernie was talking about healthcare and wages I felt he was the only one who gave a real damn. I also thought "Wow he's kinda old" so I asked my phone how old he actually was. Gemini however, wouldnt answer a simple, factual question about him. What the hell? (The answer is 83 years old btw, good luck america)
Confirmed
Dunno if your typo was intentional or not, but all I see in this thread is that somehow a typo is a way to bypass whatever block they have on discussion related to political figures. Which is bonkers. The great minds at the Goog somehow missed a pretty obvious workaround.
Or you can ask it to respond in pirate English, bypasses a lot of blocks
R3g3n3r47|ng w17h 1337 5P34k i5 7h3 n3w h0tn355.
Which feels poetic.
arrr my matee. Where be the nearest fine madens I've been seein' in this here advert? 🦜🏴☠️⚔️
That's hysterical. LLMs typically know what you're talking about, so if you misspell, they can still figure out what you're trying to say.
Holy shit that's funny
What's the knowledge cutoff date for the model? Is that even a thing on Gemini? I've been pretty intentional about not using it.
Is it from before Musk became such an overt political figure? I genuinely don't know.
It calls Twitter X, so to answer the last question: no
Gemini doesn't really have a cutoff date.
Google has implemented restrictions on Gemini's ability to provide responses on political figures and election-related topics. This is primarily due to the potential for AI to generate biased or inaccurate information, especially in the sensitive and rapidly evolving landscape of politics. Here are some of the key reasons behind this decision:
This response seems strangely AI-y
It was written with Deepseek, so it's the good AI.
This seems reasonable, honestly.
So American LLM's get to censor politics of their choosing but Chinese LLM's do not. Amazing
How about a more apt comparison to the type of stuff DeepSeek has gone viral for censoring?
Does not use the word concentration camp
Despite the injustices they faced many Japanese sought to demonstrate their loyalty to the Unites States
Look at my amazing propaganda
My sides
I didn't say it was perfect or even unbiased, just that it's better than denying something happened or refusing to talk about it.
I prefer honest censorship over covert brainwashing propaganda.
To each their own, I suppose. I prefer having the info generally available, so I can find various accounts of an event and form my own opinions. If the information is actively suppressed, it's a lot more difficult to find out what really happened than if the info is available but some sources are (heavily) biased.
No it is worse because you believe that you are informed while being woefully uninformed and even straight up lied to.
Nowhere has this been more obvious than with Palestine. Where the average CNN watching boomer who believes to be informed is actually repeating straight up Zionist lies and propaganda.
Let me swap a few words to demonstrate how bad the propaganda was that the user just posted:
Despite the injustices they faced many Uyghurs sought to demonstrate their loyalty to the Communist Party of China
Now ask DeepSeek about Tiananmen Square
So stop using them.
Damn those chinese censors!!!... wait
Gemini sounds like me in my 20's "don't talk trouble, won't be trouble"
This may be an unpopular opinion (though I doubt it), but I think this is good. I don't want people making opinions about politics based on AI output. In the best case, it isn't reliable. In the worst case, it'll make things up and lead people to false conclusions. If you want the information then it's out there. Don't rely on LLMs to give accurate information, especially on current events.
This doesn't stop people from letting Gemini control their political opinion.
But Google making Gemini not able to talk about progressivism definitely makes sure those political opinions won't be progressive.
Sure, but this is clearly any politician, not just Bernie. It can't talk about Trump either.
Kinda difficult to have an AI with those restrictions because anything is politicized depending on your pov- just getting information and using science is considered politics in 2025. That said, AIs need to do a better job sourcing their info of people are using them to search so it's at least traceable. Chances are most of this info is just from Wikipedia but they should do track it better
Well, seeing as they're just LLMs and not intelligent, yeah that would be too restrictive for any of this crap. I agree. That's fine with me.