this post was submitted on 16 Jan 2025
861 points (97.6% liked)

Uplifting News

11865 readers
2001 users here now

Welcome to /c/UpliftingNews, a dedicated space where optimism and positivity converge to bring you the most heartening and inspiring stories from around the world. We strive to curate and share content that lights up your day, invigorates your spirit, and inspires you to spread positivity in your own way. This is a sanctuary for those seeking a break from the incessant negativity often found in today's news cycle. From acts of everyday kindness to large-scale philanthropic efforts, from individual achievements to community triumphs, we bring you news that gives hope, fosters empathy, and strengthens the belief in humanity's capacity for good.

Here in /c/UpliftingNews, we uphold the values of respect, empathy, and inclusivity, fostering a supportive and vibrant community. We encourage you to share your positive news, comment, engage in uplifting conversations, and find solace in the goodness that exists around us. We are more than a news-sharing platform; we are a community built on the power of positivity and the collective desire for a more hopeful world. Remember, your small acts of kindness can be someone else's big ray of hope. Be part of the positivity revolution; share, uplift, inspire!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MoistMogwai 26 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (2 children)

I watched that clip on Kimmel. I don't normally watch but I like Bill Burr. Kimmel got really uncomfortable after he said Free Luigi. Not just like the network telling him, but in a way that seemed like Kimmel doesn't understand why people like Luigi.

[–] buddascrayon 1 points 1 hour ago

Kimmel is really quiet leftist, so he gets it. But he's also beholden to network executives who only understand money and the things that make them money. And advertisers don't like Luigi or the idea that CEOs are disposable.

[–] chakan2 19 points 5 hours ago

Kimmel gets it...his advertising people won't be happy about it though.

[–] [email protected] 50 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

It's against the rules of lemmy.world to call for violence against insurance companies, and the people who work for them, so I won't. But I don't think it's against the rules to imply I would if that wasn't in the rules.

[–] Lennnny 21 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

It's not against the rules to imply that the rules should be different.

[–] MataVatnik 4 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Unfortunately it's the jurisdiction that they operate under that enforce some of those rules.

[–] Klear 4 points 4 hours ago

Because of the implication?

[–] FlyingSquid 12 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

This is slightly off-topic, but I really hope someone films this new Broadway version of Glengarry Glen Ross, because Bill Burr and Bob Odenkirk doing Mamet? Holy fuck do I want to see that.

[–] Dozzi92 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, I listen to the Smartless podcast and they've brought it up a few times lately, including when KK was on there recently. I have very little interest in theater, but the cast alone makes me want to check it out. The cast alone will also be why I can't afford to go probably.

[–] FlyingSquid 1 points 1 hour ago

I really don't know Kieran Culkin well enough to know how he would be, but those other two make me want to see it almost as badly as I want to see the production of Waiting for Godot put on by Robin Williams and Steve Martin, which I doubt was ever filmed since it would have come out long ago.

[–] bitjunkie 3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Wait, WHAT?! Seems I have some furious Googling to do

[–] FlyingSquid 3 points 7 hours ago

Technically, that was why he was on Kimmel in the first place. To promote it. But it's Bill Burr and he gives zero fucks, so he talked politics instead (although he did also bring up the play).

https://playbill.com/article/kieran-culkin-bob-odenkirk-bill-burr-to-star-in-broadway-revival-of-glengarry-glen-ross

load more comments
view more: next ›