this post was submitted on 16 Jan 2025
23 points (92.6% liked)

Canada

7330 readers
430 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It seems like our leaders don't think they need to answer questions:

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau was the trendsetter here, making the rounds on non-political and non-Canadian podcasts over the past year ... the questions he faced were less hard-nosed than those from Parliament Hill reporters

...

Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre sitting down with Jordan Peterson for a very long talk on Mr. Peterson’s [podcast] ... An interview so friendly it’s annoying to the subject is an amazing thing to pull off, but this is the moment we’re in.

...

And now this week, you have Mark Carney ... on The Daily Show. Host Jon Stewart began the interview by crediting Mr. Carney with steering Canada through the 2008 recession without lasting scars, and that was an accurate amuse-bouche for the tone of the whole thing.

The shitty part is that voters seem cool with it. We don't care that our leaders skip hard questions and go on lame podcasts. We're okay to forego fact checking and give them a pass.

Original link: https://www.theglobeandmail.com/politics/opinion/article-people-who-want-to-be-in-charge-are-making-their-case-to-very-softball/

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Is this NSFW due to some companies having a "no chat about politics, religion or sport" rule?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Oops! I must have hit that button by accident. Thanks for pointing it out.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

All good. I was just kinda expecting something saucy, thought I'd ask

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'll try harder for saucy content next time

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

Not all heroes wear capes o7

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Oh yea I was meaning to watch that Daily Show episode. I don't really care what questions they ask him, just want to see what he has to say for himself.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago

He handles himself well, but it's light on policy. The closest he comes is saying something about how Canadians deserve a carbon tax that puts the burden on big companies, and not on the people. This would seem to suggest he would make some changes there.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

As long as people are herded into the mindset where we vote for a team instead of demanding quantifiable progress towards specific outcomes, it doesn't matter. We'll draw our own conclusions favourable to whoever has domesticated us.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Should one expect the daily show or Jordan Peterson to press their feet to the coals?

I'd assume these are just softball campaign stump events.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

That's what the oped says.