this post was submitted on 04 Jan 2025
145 points (99.3% liked)

Today I Learned

18260 readers
495 users here now

What did you learn today? Share it with us!

We learn something new every day. This is a community dedicated to informing each other and helping to spread knowledge.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must begin with TIL. Linking to a source of info is optional, but highly recommended as it helps to spark discussion.

** Posts must be about an actual fact that you have learned, but it doesn't matter if you learned it today. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.**



Rule 2- Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding non-TIL posts.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-TIL posts using the [META] tag on your post title.



Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.

If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.

For further explanation, clarification and feedback about this rule, you may follow this link.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.

Unless included in our Whitelist for Bots, your bot will not be allowed to participate in this community. To have your bot whitelisted, please contact the moderators for a short review.



Partnered Communities

You can view our partnered communities list by following this link. To partner with our community and be included, you are free to message the moderators or comment on a pinned post.

Community Moderation

For inquiry on becoming a moderator of this community, you may comment on the pinned post of the time, or simply shoot a message to the current moderators.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
  • R.S.C. 1985, c. C-46, s. 365. Justice Laws Website. Government of Canada. Published: 2024-12-10. Accessed: 2025-01-04T22:46Z. https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/c-46/section-365-20030101.html.

    365 Every one who fraudulently

    (a) pretends to exercise or to use any kind of witchcraft, sorcery, enchantment or conjuration,

    (b) undertakes, for a consideration, to tell fortunes, or

    (c) pretends from his skill in or knowledge of an occult or crafty science to discover where or in what manner anything that is supposed to have been stolen or lost may be found,

    is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction.

  • "An Act to amend the Criminal Code and the Department of Justice Act and to make consequential amendments to another Act" C-51. 42nd Parliament, 1st session. Parliament of Canada. Published: 2018-12-13. Accessed: 2025-01-04T22:50Z. https://www.parl.ca/legisinfo/en/bill/42-1/c-51.
    • §41

      Section 365 of the Act is repealed.

top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Warl0k3 54 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Canada had anti-fraudulent witchcraft laws. Legit fortune tellers would have been fine.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Legit fortune tellers could see them coming /s

[–] Warl0k3 11 points 5 days ago (2 children)

The only thing that can stop a bad fortune teller is a good fortuneteller.
...
With a gun.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 5 days ago

This just in, A small medium at large

[–] jaybone 4 points 5 days ago
[–] [email protected] -1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

Im curious, when you tell a joke outloud to someone, do you always say "im joking!" Immediately after?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Generally when telling a joke out loud it’s obvious it’s a joke based on the speaker’s tone and other factors.

With text-based communication it’s much more difficult to do the same without resorting to /s, Emoji or some other signal.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Generally nobody would ever take "Legit fortune tellers could see them coming" as a serious statement.

Edit: Apparently there are at least five people on lemmy that actually believe there are legit fortune tellers in real life. That's... wow.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

…and that’s the point of the /s, as you never know who your audience is and/or you don’t want to be taken seriously as you’ve so done with the people downvoting you.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I don't pander to an audience that doesn't understand context and written language.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Then don't use /s for clarity then. Your problem is that you had a go at @[email protected] for doing so, which quite frankly wasn't any of your business.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 4 days ago

Quite frankly it's none of your business who i talk to.

Boom

[–] captainlezbian 1 points 4 days ago

No, during, it's an intonation and facial expression

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Canada had anti-fraudulent witchcraft laws.

I'll update the title accordingly. I think it's important to specify what you've stated, for clarity.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Also, imo, regular anti-fraud laws, and regular tort law can take over for the nonexistence of this specific law. For example, if someone is advertising a business, even if it's something of an occult nature, and then they don't deliver what they promise, I'd argue that that's standard false advertisement.

[–] DreamlandLividity 1 points 4 days ago

That's debatable, since the fraud usually has to be something a reasonable person could believe. E.g. no suing Copperfield for faking magic, even if he advertises it as real.

[–] FlyingSquid 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

WELL WHAT THE HELL AM I GOING TO DO NOW IF I GO TO SASKATOON AND I GET TURNED INTO A NEWT?!

GET BETTER?!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)

No, because if you get turned into a newt, it wouldn't have been covered by this anyway.

[–] aleq 3 points 5 days ago

Maybe they were promised to be turned into a dragon or something?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Punishable by burning at the stake?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Ha, punishable on summary conviction (it's mentioned in the post's cited law).

[–] tdawg 5 points 6 days ago

Excellent now I can use my crafty science