this post was submitted on 21 Dec 2024

507 points (95.7% liked)

pics

19797 readers

20 users here now

Rules:

1.. Please mark original photos with [OC] in the title if you're the photographer

2..Pictures containing a politician from any country or planet are prohibited, this is a community voted on rule.

3.. Image must be a photograph, no AI or digital art.

4.. No NSFW/Cosplay/Spam/Trolling images.

5.. Be civil. No racism or bigotry.

Photo of the Week Rule(s):

1.. On Fridays, the most upvoted original, marked [OC], photo posted between Friday and Thursday will be the next week's banner and featured photo.

2.. The weekly photos will be saved for an end of the year run off.

Weeks 2023

Instance-wide rules always apply. https://mastodon.world/about

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

507

[OC] Best graffiti of the day (lemmy.world)

submitted 1 week ago by wowwoweowza to c/pics

22 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 22 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] ccunning 23 points 1 week ago

If the CEO was shit
You must acquit

[–] Winged_Hussar 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

[–] Winged_Hussar 14 points 1 week ago

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago

[–] robocall 6 points 1 week ago

Clear message. Straight to the point.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

I'll take it!

[–] cabron_offsets 3 points 1 week ago

Acquit.

[+] [email protected] -15 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Yay murder

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Do you only support systemic murder?

[–] [email protected] -5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I said yay murder. I think we need more of it from both political sides especially. I don't want anyone to ever feel safe. I think the bigger should rule the weaker and the ones with guns the ones without. Also fuck elections. Let's just shoot the candidates we don't like untill we come across someone everyone is for and then lets shoot them too.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

My apologies. It reads like you’re mocking the glorification of murder.

[+] [email protected] -6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You kidding me? Why would any sane person think murder is bad?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I guess it’s like the trolley problem. Is it better to murder one CEO if it brings about reform and saves more lives in the long run.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Is it okay for hospital to murder one random healthy person if you can then take their organs and save 5 people?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I don’t think that’s a good comparison. The One healthy person existing isn’t making the other 5 people’s lives worse.

Whereas with private health insurance beholden to shareholders is a predatory system that enables systemic misery and death. UHG are particularly egregious in their denials.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I’m not saying it’s inconceivable that the murder of such a person could lead to positive change, but the murderer themselves should not be celebrated - they should be treated for what they are: a murderer. Encouraging vigilante justice will not create the kind of world people naively imagine. Not everyone agrees on who the “bad people” are.

This kind of violence will eventually be directed at our heroes too, and anyone celebrating people like Luigi will then have no moral ground to stand on from where to condemn that violence. It’s exactly what they asked for.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Sometimes a murder victim deserved it. As a CEO of a major private health insurance company, notorious in its own right for claim denials, Mr. Thompson was significantly responsible for a good amount of social murder. There are of course other social murderers out there, but we should be grateful this one was stopped.

Anyway, the working class is already disproportionately victimized by the bourgeoisie. They're the ones with no moral standing. They're the ones asking for it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Similar argument can be used to justify the murder of many other people we would otherwise deem good. This is not the way. There's a reason we no longer act like we did during the middle ages. It's not for individual rogue actors to choose who gets to live and who doesn't. That's not a world anyone wants to live in.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Are you suggesting that that the nature of a murder victim shouldn't be relevant in a murder trial? Killing a bad guy should be potentially completely mitigating. We have precedent for that. For example, Gary Plauché served no prison time for publicly murdering his son's rapist.

[–] WordWhittler 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yay, let's derail the conversation about the very real impact health services—when run for profit—have on hundreds of thousands of lives! When pushed to their breaking point some people lash out? Violence is a sign of a dysfunctional system?!?! That sounds made up, and murder is bad I can't believe we're condoning murder!!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

That's what you call it when people don't agree with your narrative? "Derailing the conversation?"

[–] wowwoweowza 1 points 1 week ago

I’m sure that if Luigi had have had the means to give the CEO a wasting disease and then deny him coverage he would have, but he didn’t. So a bullet.