this post was submitted on 17 Dec 2024
122 points (99.2% liked)

World News

39329 readers
1743 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 22 points 12 hours ago

Oh yay more whittling down of an already conglomerated industry surely this will be good for people

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 hours ago

Could Honda's interest be based on Nissan's frame-based trucks? I don't think Honda has any recent history in those markets.

[–] olafurp 4 points 8 hours ago

Better tech for Mitsubishi will also be well received

[–] swag_money 31 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

no don't nissan my hondas :(

[–] [email protected] 9 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Honestly though….. I wouldn’t be against a Honda’d Nissan…….

[–] ms_lane 1 points 15 minutes ago

*Except the electronics

[–] [email protected] 39 points 16 hours ago (3 children)

That sounds like a disaster for Honda. Nissan doesn't hardly have anything to offer except supply/sales volume. Honda beats them on engine tech, transmission tech, chassis tech, basically everything. Honda has lots to lose by taking on their mess, and Nissan doesn't.

[–] FlyingSquid 19 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I don't know about in Japan, but in the US, Nissan has a sub-$30k EV with the Leaf and Honda does not. So that would be worth something to them considering California is trying to phase out ICE cars.

https://insideevs.com/news/744407/ev-california-gas-car-sales-ban-2035/

[–] [email protected] 5 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

That's still only a single model that is <8% of Nissan's already abysmal US sales volume. Nissan's massive pile of garbage that fills up the rest of portfolio (and institutional problems behind the scenes) is absolutely NOT worth dealing with for the technology in a single model like that, even if it is "necessary" to offer to ensure compliance eith wishy washy regulatory soon-to-be's. They would be much better off clean-slating their own, EV tech is significantly easier to develop compared to new ICE designs and if anyone is capable of that, it's Honda.

[–] FlyingSquid 9 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

It's a single model and virtually the only model of EV less affluent Americans can afford. That's a huge market.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Except the chevy volt is in the same sub 30k category and they handily beat the pants off of the leaf in range. The leaf only gets a meager 149 miles per charge. The volt can go about 100 miles further and has the ability to charge faster.

[–] JJROKCZ 1 points 1 hour ago

? I own a leaf and get 215 miles per charge... Plus for most peoples the 149 on the base model is fine to go to work and back daily

2020 leaf sv plus owner here. Range is 212 officially but when my car is full charge it tells me 215 iirc

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

It is a big, untapped market but it's not a big market for the Leaf. Tesla sold 3x more Model 3 in the last year alone than Nissan has sold in the entire 14 year production run of the Leaf. It's a hot mess.

[–] FlyingSquid 1 points 3 hours ago

The Model 3 is over $40,000. It's selling more because Americans are barely even aware cheaper EVs exist.

[–] fuzzywombat 5 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

I absolutely agree with you there. For consumer space this merger doesn't make sense for Honda. For Nissan share holder, this is fantastic.. Only thing I can think of is Nissan has some EV tech that Honda could use but that's quite the stretch. Nissan actually jumped into EV relatively early but they didn't iterate on it quickly enough to matter. Honda has been dragging their feet on EV and they both completely missed the boat on bridge tech offering like plug in hybrid. This merger isn't going to do anything to fix that.

Since Nissan is now a low end brand and Honda is moving more towards premium side perhaps being together would cover the market segments better. The merger absolutely does nothing for the high end market though.

The one thing that I don't know anything about is the commercial market domestically in Japan. Perhaps Nissan has good market share which Honda could gain from this merger. Maybe someone could chime in on this.

[–] Lag 1 points 16 hours ago

Public perception is also a factor. Even seeing collaborated cars like their EV Chevy thing takes away from Honda's perception of reliability.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 17 hours ago (3 children)

Nissan has been a dumpster fire for two decades. Honda should steer clear.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 hours ago

They definitely need to pump the brakes on this potential merger.

[–] Addv4 18 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Nissan holds a majority stake with Mitsubishi. That actually might be worth something to Honda, and they also seem to be able to produce some cheap evs, like the leaf which Honda doesn't seem able to do currently.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Mitsubishi the conglomerate or Mitsubishi the automaker? The former seems good but not the latter.

[–] Addv4 2 points 1 hour ago

Auto I believe, but that still might be useful. They have access to Cummins engines, which are basically one of the only manufacturers that meet the next phase of ghg emissions requirements. Plus since Honda seems to be retooling their factories for solid state batteries, it might allow them to produce some stop gap evs without relying on other manufacturers like GM (Hondas latest is just a rebadged Chevy Blazer EV).

[–] KoalaUnknown 3 points 16 hours ago

On the other hand, maybe a merger will help them get their shit together and compete with Toyota.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Guaranteed this just turns Honda into Nissan quality

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 hours ago

Drop a honda NA 4 cylinder drivetrain into a nissan vehicle and sell it for a lower price than a Honda and I'd be cool with it. Nissans only really issue is their engines and trannys they use.

[–] Makhno 11 points 17 hours ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 hours ago

V-Tec Mitsubishi lancer evo (because Nissan has a majority stake in Mitsubishi)? 👉👈

[–] DaddleDew 21 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

With the current market we're more likely to see a Juke CRV 🤢

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 hours ago

Maybe a Murano Pilot Cabriolet

[–] Ace0fBlades 2 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

Nissan Z with Vtec?

🥺 👉👈

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 hours ago

Bye bye Honda