this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2024
282 points (99.3% liked)

politics

19223 readers
2866 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 64 points 1 day ago (2 children)

AOC loses key vote in House Oversight race to Gerry Connolly

[–] FuglyDuck 60 points 1 day ago (1 children)

an Old. White. man.

Seriously. It's pissing me off; more so the republicans doing it. we need minority voices. We can't expect the republicans to do it- lets just be honest here. and I doubt very much if Connolly will be able to push back nearly as much as AOC can and will. (never mind, whether or not he's willing.)

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 day ago (4 children)

An old white man with cancer that he announced a month ago. He should be focusing on his treatment, not adding more to his plate.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What the fuck? This is a special dipshit cherry to put on top of just automatically choosing the oldest option. Even if the leadership still hate AOC, choose someone who's definitely going to be at the top of their game, not award important positions to so he can be proud while taking time off for his pressing health needs.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

What the fuck? This is a special dipshit cherry to put on top of just automatically choosing the oldest option.

He won because Pelosi wanted him to win. That is literally the answer.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] UnderpantsWeevil 35 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Gerry Connolly

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gerry_Connolly

The Congressman's Congressman. He represents the district right outside DC. Also, prior to running for office he worked as an aide to the United States Senate Committee on Foreign Relations where he managed committee oversight of international economic issues, international narcotics control, and United Nations and Middle East policies, and published reports on U.S. policy in El Salvador, Central America, Israel, and the Persian Gulf region.

So, expect a guy who will toe the line on all our accumulated foreign policy blunders while banging a gavel to silence another generation of anti-war protesters.

It gets worse than that, of course.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gerry_Connolly#Legislation_sponsored

Sponsoring legislation with Darrell Issa - a shameless, virulent Silicon Valley shill of a politician - as Trump lards up his cabinet with Friends of Peter Thiel is a bleak sign for the future.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 46 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Cool a 74 year old, that’s the life expectancy of a male in the US.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ceenote 40 points 1 day ago

This country is totally capable of fighting off creeping fascism. It's the Democrat leadership that's not up to the task.

[–] Rapidcreek 31 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Connolly had 34 and AOC had 27, but there is a full caucus vote tomorrow.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 day ago

One House Democrat aligned with Ocasio-Cortez told Axios that steering is "made up of the most senior members," making it not her most receptive venue.

Because having senior members has worked so well so far...I get senior also means experience, but we need some new blood too, not status quo. And the past experience so far with AOC's roles in committees shows she has what's needed.

[–] chilicheeselies 15 points 1 day ago

After 2016, ive wondered for a while if it would have made more sense to run progressives in republican primaries instead of dem ones. We would probably have been better off if progressives took advantage of republican party weaknesses

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 day ago

At this point, the most determined and successful opponent of progressivism in the US is the Democrat party.

[–] inclementimmigrant 17 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Hence why I staunchly refuse to donate to Democrats currently. Fuck these old ass, no idea jackasses clinging onto old shit ideas and continuing to lose at every god damn level of politics.

I hope AOC continues to be a light and the fight in the Democratic party that doesn't deserve her.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Let's not forget that AOC voted to protect the rail corporation from a union strike.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 day ago

The ghoul strikes again.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›