"now"???
this post was submitted on 10 Dec 2024
67 points (97.2% liked)
UK Politics
3139 readers
113 users here now
General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both [email protected] and [email protected] .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.
Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.
Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.
If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)
Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.
Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.
[email protected] appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
This is exactly why the government is right to reform planning law and allow more building, even if that on its own won't be sufficient to deal with the scope of the crisis.
Reforming planning is good, some of the ideas I’m not 100% behind though.
I'm never 100% behind anything, but I think that in a crisis - and this is a crisis - you need to be radical and take risks. Caution is not going to cut it.
In all fairness whatever they do, it will be wrong, or too much or not enough.
You’re right about it being a crisis.
Not really, the thing that stabilises house prices more than continual building is increasing community/council housing. If that is available at reasonable rent at a decent scale, it curbs rent prices in the surrounding area, and takes house prices back down with it, as the only people able to afford houses at the moment are those wealthy enough to see them as investments, not homes
Iirc they've already cancelled Right to Buy, which is an important first step
In principle, there's nothing wrong with the right to buy.
The issue with right to buy is that sold off council stock is not replaced and that many people can't get a council house in the first place.
But you still have to either build it or convert existing non-residential building into residential building. Existing planning law makes it much too easy for nimbys to block either, hence the need for reform. Fact is, we need to build, convert, and add more council housing, but we need new planning law, first, to make any of those three possible.
There doesn’t seem to be any hinderance to the large developers that bang up low-quality estates by the hundred…
People feel like there are a lot of these, because they're conspicuous, but there really just isn't enough building going on.
Part of the issue with the low-quality housing is that it's often in the middle of nowhere, with no connections - because nimbyism has made it impossible to build housing where it's needed or to build the infrastructure that would improve the quality. So there's a vicious cycle of: good housing is blocked > low-quality housing is built > people point to low-quality housing as a reason to block more developments > good housing is blocked...
Sounds like there are officially too many houses. Burn them down.
dont worry going after trans kids should help /s
Am I the only one that thinks this is a weird place to shoehorn in an entirely unrelated issue?
I understand that you feel strongly about the issues faced by trans kids, but I don't see what it has to do with unaffordable house prices.
Reforming planning permission and higher build targets might, though.