this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2024
-6 points (40.6% liked)

Conservative

401 readers
36 users here now

A place to discuss pro-conservative stuff

  1. Be excellent to each other. Civility, No Racism, No Bigotry, No Slurs, No calls to violences, No namecalling, All that good stuff, follow lemm.ee's rules, follow the rules of your instance, etc.

  2. We are a Pro-Conservative forum. Posts must have a clear pro-conservative, or anti left-wing bias. We are interested in promoting conservatism and discussing things that might get ignored elsewhere. All sources are acceptable, however reputable sources with a reputation for factual reporting are preferred.

  3. Dissent is allowed in the comments, but try to be constructive; if you do not agree, then provide a reason which is backed up by references or a reasonable alternative interpretation of the provided facts. That means the left wing is welcome to state their opinions, but please keep it in good faith.

A polite request, not a rule, if you feel the need to report a comment, please don't reply to it.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Okay?

I don't see a problem here. Right wing personalities encourage harming and killing LGBTQ+ people and liberals, far-right people bomb abortion clinics and kill doctors, but now it's suddenly bad to say that oh, yeah, some people deserve a good killin'?

Seems like crocodile tears to me.

[–] the_toast_is_gone -3 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

I haven't seen nearly as many right-wing people praising/encouraging obvious murder at I have here and on Bluesky. If something horrible happened to Nancy Pelosi, you sure wouldn't see me posing with a model of her decapitated head - unlike a certain comedian.

Even granting what you say, is putting out veiled death threats under one's real name really the kind of thing leftist figures should be doing in the wake of an election where Trump was nearly killed twice and the US decided that the left is too extreme for them?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 days ago (2 children)

the US decided that the left is too extreme for them?

Er. No. That's not what happened. When you look at vote totals from 2020, you can see that Biden got 81M votes to Trump's 74M. Looking at vote totals from 2024, Harris got 74M votes--the same as Trump in 2020--and Trump eked out a slightly improved performance at 77m. This isn't a 'mandate'; this is fewer people showing up to the polls. If the same number of people had voted in 2024 as voted in 2020, it's probable that Trump would have lost again. That isn't people saying the left is "too extreme", that's apathy.

[–] the_toast_is_gone -1 points 6 days ago

Given the levels of alarm that were being raised by the media and politicians across the aisle, I doubt people were too apathic to vote. It's hard to feel like that when every person on your screens tells you that Trump is a fascist threat to democracy. It's more likely that so many people​ sat out because they didn't like the direction that both parties were taking. Less "I don't care," more "I can't support either side."

[–] [email protected] -2 points 6 days ago

Could it be that some people found the left to be too extreme but they weren't ready to vote for a Republican yet?

[–] [email protected] -2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

To be fair, like most left wing echo chambers like Reddit, you're probably more likely to see extreme content there than amongst most people on the left.

[–] the_toast_is_gone 2 points 6 days ago

You are, but redditors are so strong a stereotype that you have just about every other site gunning against them. Even other redditors hate redditors.

[–] Anticorp 6 points 6 days ago

This event seems to have united all people in a way that I haven't seen since 9/11. There's nobody in the country who hasn't been affected by the greedy and evil practices of health insurance companies. Conservatives and liberals alike seem to all be responding with "and nothing of value was lost" type responses.

This is from an article I read earlier today:

"Beyond the shooter's own motives, it's clear from the shockingly celebratory reaction online to Thompson's murder that anger about the American insurance and healthcare system has reached the point of literal bloodlust."

People are fed up, and millions have been pushed to a breaking point

[–] breadsmasher 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Headline is a straight lie. She actually said, as the article buries

And people wonder why we want these executives dead

[–] [email protected] -3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

What is the is difference between -

"We want these executives dead" and "And people wonder why we want these executives dead". Both statements want them dead.

[–] HandBash 3 points 5 days ago

Passive and active voice. Also the part about"and people wonder why"

[–] T00l_shed 6 points 6 days ago

I didn't see anything about "encouraging" nothing like standing back and standing by at all.

[–] Mandarbmax 2 points 5 days ago

She is saying what we are all thinking.