this post was submitted on 04 Dec 2024
118 points (97.6% liked)

Technology

59776 readers
4692 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] hypnicjerk 24 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

anyone else remember low orbit ion cannon DDOSing? i guess life imitates art

edit: receivers. doy. reading comprehension is hard.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

I assume in this case it's DDOSing the satellite,not the other way round?

[–] General_Effort 4 points 8 hours ago

Satellite receiver usually means a thingy for receiving satellite TV. Receiver means that it only receives signals but cannot transmit any.

I assume that these are internet enabled. Maybe just for updates, or maybe to also do streaming. So, I take it to mean that they do the normal internet DDOS thing on the side, in a way that has nothing to do with satellites.

[–] hypnicjerk 6 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Moreover, users of the satellite receivers were involuntarily taking part in attacks and might have experienced reduced device performance during these occurrences.

the article isn't 100% clear, but this line suggested to me that they were being used to perform attacks themselves (although it also states "Allegedly, the functionality was needed to counter the attacks of a competing entity.")

[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 hours ago

I understand it as the receivers were deliberately attacking their competitors satellites (and that this would effect their performance as it was wasting bandwidth).

Countering in this case would be by making their competitors service as bad as theirs?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 hours ago

Unexpectedly, but apparantly Korea is reunited again

[–] [email protected] 8 points 9 hours ago

It's too bad we don't have details about the other company involved that they were targeting. Seems like the sort of thing that could rapidly escalated -- blinding all of your competitors birds on purpose. If those birds are in Geosynch, you don't even need to be in the country to do it -- just same longitude, approximately.