this post was submitted on 27 Nov 2024
133 points (95.2% liked)

World News

39340 readers
3159 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FlyingSquid 48 points 3 weeks ago (67 children)

I admit I'm super surprised that the conscription age is 25.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

At 25 people actually have had chance to finish their education, maybe work a few years, experience real life outside school and be mostly formed individuals.

This is bad for attacking armys like the US and Russia, where brainwashing of teenagers makes it easier to get them to pull the trigger on defenseless people.

This is good for defending armys where people actually know what they fight for.

[–] FlyingSquid 3 points 2 weeks ago

I would think it would be better for defending armies to have every able-bodied person fight the invaders. Less troops seems like a worse thing than more troops.

load more comments (66 replies)
[–] [email protected] 22 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

It is massively fucked but... they probably should.

This war is ending in March or April one way or another. Europe/NATO have committed to supporting Ukraine. The US is almost guaranteed to actively betray them. And you can bet the EU and the like are going to be consolidating resources in fear of whatever else comes up.

So Ukraine needs to win NOW. It is probably already too late to meaningfully train those conscripts but having a military force that can act in that small window of late January is basically their only hope.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Its actually kinda amazing they are doing so well with so limited a draft and how russia has had to call in north korea. I mean even if russia wins their method to to fuck up ukraine infrastructure so then at that point what have they won and they buried themselves in the process.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Sanctus 18 points 3 weeks ago (9 children)

At that rate you might as well let NATO serve the purpose it was created for. Even tho that will.probably spark a world war.

[–] lennybird 20 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Honestly I'm all for it; then handing the keys to Trump lmao.

Or implement a No Fly Zone and fully commit NATO forces to air defense. See Putin squirm on what to do and how to react. Makes the Putin-Trump relationship tense. Trump backing down would be seen as weak. Putin wouldn't retaliate because he wouldn't risk losing his puppet.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] LANIK2000 17 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

That's rich. "Send your future down the drain while we continue to send scraps." tho even the scraps are gonna run dry soon. Fuck biden. He could have gone down in history as a truly great leader, got everything handed to him on a silver platter, but clearly, he wishes to walk in Chamberlin's shoes.

Honestly I'm ashamed, especially as a European, we should be doing so much more. We haven't learned anything from the great wars... We're experiencing a "what if Czechoslovakia fought back" scenario, we can end it right there in Ukraine. But no...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] olafurp 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

How about sending artillery shells instead? If the US is running out of artillery shells it should invest in some production capacity since it's critical for any large scale war, absolute no brainer.

[–] GreenKnight23 4 points 2 weeks ago

artillery shells buy you attack power.

Soldiers buy you military might.

once Trump gets into power they will no longer get military attack from the US and they won't have the time to drum up military might because Russia is doubling their attacks on Jan 6th.

load more comments
view more: next ›