I figured soviet ships had so many weapons because only half worked at any given time
this post was submitted on 24 Nov 2024
91 points (96.9% liked)
NonCredibleDefense
6664 readers
1073 users here now
A community for your defence shitposting needs
Rules
1. Be nice
Do not make personal attacks against each other, call for violence against anyone, or intentionally antagonize people in the comment sections.
2. Explain incorrect defense articles and takes
If you want to post a non-credible take, it must be from a "credible" source (news article, politician, or military leader) and must have a comment laying out exactly why it's non-credible. Low-hanging fruit such as random Twitter and YouTube comments belong in the Matrix chat.
3. Content must be relevant
Posts must be about military hardware or international security/defense. This is not the page to fawn over Youtube personalities, simp over political leaders, or discuss other areas of international policy.
4. No racism / hatespeech
No slurs. No advocating for the killing of people or insulting them based on physical, religious, or ideological traits.
5. No politics
We don't care if you're Republican, Democrat, Socialist, Stalinist, Baathist, or some other hot mess. Leave it at the door. This applies to comments as well.
6. No seriousposting
We don't want your uncut war footage, fundraisers, credible news articles, or other such things. The world is already serious enough as it is.
7. No classified material
Classified ‘western’ information is off limits regardless of how "open source" and "easy to find" it is.
8. Source artwork
If you use somebody's art in your post or as your post, the OP must provide a direct link to the art's source in the comment section, or a good reason why this was not possible (such as the artist deleting their account). The source should be a place that the artist themselves uploaded the art. A booru is not a source. A watermark is not a source.
9. No low-effort posts
No egregiously low effort posts. E.g. screenshots, recent reposts, simple reaction & template memes, and images with the punchline in the title. Put these in weekly Matrix chat instead.
10. Don't get us banned
No brigading or harassing other communities. Do not post memes with a "haha people that I hate died… haha" punchline or violating the sh.itjust.works rules (below). This includes content illegal in Canada.
11. No misinformation
NCD exists to make fun of misinformation, not to spread it. Make outlandish claims, but if your take doesn’t show signs of satire or exaggeration it will be removed. Misleading content may result in a ban. Regardless of source, don’t post obvious propaganda or fake news. Double-check facts and don't be an idiot.
Join our Matrix chatroom
Other communities you may be interested in
Banner made by u/Fertility18
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Can't learn anything from an exercise where you roflstomp the opponent after all.
But its great for getting promoted
Broken Arrow was a lightning fast refund for me.
Russian prototypes Vs American cold war stuff.
T-14 Armata Vs M1A1
T-15 Armata Vs Stryker
You're not even trying.
I found maintenance and repairing a rifle to be the more effective way to gesture towards balancing warfare for gaming.
NATO: 99% durability? JAM
AK? Here's duct tape and a file, keep shooting.
Also DCS world with the Ka-50 and all the AMRAAM drama, yet another Russian dev team doing Russian dev team things
What's the story? Giving an aircraft an inaccurate weapon system?
The DCS Ka-50 isn't a real aircraft, it was a development platform that was abandoned by the Russians and only a few were made, all in different configurations. The devs made it then made a paid upgrade package that slapped a bunch of random stuff like missile sensors and air to air missiles onto it. They did this while staunchly maintaining that all the western aircraft had to be perfect to the rivet, including removing weapons systems and features from aircraft that verifiably had them but not within the absurdly narrow window of the one they wanted to model.
Got it, thank you for the background. The Ka-50 was the single seat prototype for the ka-52 basically, right?
Yeah they were trying to see if it was workable. It wasn't so they built the ka52. It was appealing for a game though because it wouldn't require multi crew networking or an AI copilot, something they added around a decade later in development for other systems.