this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2024
1004 points (98.9% liked)

Showerthoughts

30000 readers
638 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. A showerthought should offer a unique perspective on an ordinary part of life.

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. Avoid politics
    • 3.1) NEW RULE as of 5 Nov 2024, trying it out
    • 3.2) Political posts often end up being circle jerks (not offering unique perspective) or enflaming (too much work for mods).
    • 3.3) Try c/politicaldiscussion, volunteer as a mod here, or start your own community.
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] LovableSidekick 0 points 5 days ago

They say do what you know best.

[–] hark 76 points 1 month ago (2 children)

This is why it's silly hearing billionaires, who do the most damage to our planet, telling us how urgently we need to "get off this rock" which has supported life for millions of years in favor of some dead planet. It's really just an extension of capitalism that demands infinite space to exploit, instead of being content with sustainability.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

Elon’s argument for why we need to spread to other planets holds true even if everything on Earth were going perfectly.

It’s not about getting everyone off Earth - it’s about creating a backup for humanity on other planets. This ensures that the only known flame of consciousness in the universe isn’t extinguished by a nuclear war, pandemic, supervolcano, or asteroid impact. It's about not having all your eggs in one basket.

[–] Kalladblog 17 points 1 month ago (4 children)

By extension it would give more of an excuse for the top 1% to give even less of a fck about earth and the climate. Next thing you'd see is all the rich bailing to another planet while those who can't afford it are left with what's left of earth and the hellscape they left behind (and probably still have more agency over earth than those still living on there).

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago

And, if people like Musk hold it, it would let them tax us etc.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] slumberlust 7 points 1 month ago (4 children)

This is not risk free. When you give people access to space and still have terrorism and wars, things can end badly quickly.

There's also a valid argument around where to best focus those resources now. We are nowhere near ready for space colonization on any scale, let alone sustainable ones.

A City on Mars by the Wienersmiths dives into some of these challenges if you are interested.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (4 children)

We will most likely always have terrorism and wars. That's not an argument against letting wealthy individuals fund a private space race.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

He meant the budget spent on space is enormous and there are more urgent priorities on Earth solve so he does get it.

We already have Mars populated by human-made robots, and one going to Europa moon, terraforming means you're thinking of making it habitable for humans, a huge difference from sending robots to do researches to understand better the moons/asteroids/planets.

The point you try saying his argument which seems against billionaires to be invalid instead of arguing against any other point he made just points out your focus is being an apologist for the wealthy to keep doing what they do best, starve and explore everyone else.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

It's private wealth, not government funding. They're free to use their wealth how ever they see fit as long as it's legal.

Ad-hominem is not argument to the contrary either.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

Our bodies are simply not made to leave earth for a long period. It's a lofty goal but completely unrealistic when considering our biology has evolved specifically to live here.

Has no one learned anything from War of the Worlds?

Also, remember how humanity really messed things up when we started colonising other parts of our globe? We brought disease, we murdered and we polluted.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

If you can make people survive on Mars, you're more than able to make pockets of humanity survive those disasters on Earth

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It should also be a strong strong signal to stop listening to the apes that are hoarding all the bananas, and instead, eat that banana-hoarding abhorrence.

[–] Shardikprime 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Bananas make for a terrible time value storage in the real world

In donkey Kong country tho? He who controls bananas controls the universe

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I heard if you ingest huge quantities of bananine, you will see the golden path humanity must walk, but will be condemned to life as a half banana, half human monstrosity.

[–] Shardikprime 1 points 1 month ago

100% radioactive decay

[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The good news is that it will never get to that point. Venus is a different planet with a different makeup and history.

The bad news, it doesn't have to get nearly that bad to be bad for us and the rest of existing life. Not even close. Just a few degrees more, and we're doing really well in getting there.

[–] NewNewAccount 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I’ve heard of the runaway greenhouse gas effect. Is there a limit to that?

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago

The limit is our distance from the Sun. After a certain point the greenhouse gasses can't make up for the fact that we just get less radiation than Venus does. The maximum potential I've seen is 10°C - almost all life would go extinct and we'd have to live on the tropical Antarctic archipelago, but not Venus.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Everything find equilibrium eventually. I'm sure any limits for a runaway situation depend on a lot of factors, but their ceilings are all far above anything we could tolerate. Runaway doesn't mean there's no point to level out, only that at the time it's not controllable and escalating fast.

The last "runaway" situation the Earth had was called the Paleocene–Eocene Thermal Maximum (PETM) 56 million years ago and globally had a 5-8 degree Celsius rise over thousands of years. That might be a good example of a natural situation and its limits. Keep in mind the differences in rate, we're increasing the global temperature faster than the PETM (or anything we've found in geological history) so we don't know how that faster rate will act in determining a peak. There's theories of pushing the Earth into a hothouse world that would have its own equilibrium that is far hotter than we can survive.

[–] kameecoding 20 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Bruh, just realized terraforming starts with terra and that's why it's what it's called

[–] Dasus 4 points 1 month ago

The term translates horribly into Finnish: "maankaltaistaminen". "To make like Earth/ground/dirt" and "make like" as in "type", not "form".

So it could be like "earthlikening" instead of "terraforming".

Which makes me think of this Wikipedia that's written in the way they imagine English could've evolved if it wasn't influenced by Latin.

https://anglish.fandom.com/wiki/Main_leaf

for instance their article on maths starts with:

Telcraft (scorelore, rimecraft or reckonlore) (English: Mathematics) is the smeying of scorings, or the recking of begrips such as score, room, shift, and forebuilding. Benjamin Peirce called it "the cunning which draws needful outcomes".

Through foredeeming and wordlock mulling, scorelore arose from notching, reckoning, deeming, and the learning of sheathes and shapes.

Knowledge and note of fern scorelore have always been a spanning and a needful lifetool, as can be witnessed from orshafts of Egypt, Bearithland, Indland, China and Frodland. Furthermore, the Ishango bone is more than 20 thousand years old.

Titillating, isn't it?

[–] B312 2 points 1 month ago
[–] TheFeatureCreature 15 points 1 month ago

But think of the shareholders!!

[–] IchNichtenLichten 7 points 1 month ago

The acid rain is going be be so slimming.

[–] Dadifer 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Much more likely the whole earth turns into a desert, no?

[–] UnderpantsWeevil 8 points 1 month ago

Earth's surface is 2/3rds water and that's not changing.

But intense heat means more storms with stronger winds and heavier rain. Imagine a Cat 5 hitting the coast every year.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

No, that would be mercuryforming Earth. Earth will still have an atmosphere and rainfall, though it may no longer be livable for humans.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I, for one, would like to give a shout-out to my dog, magnetosphere!

Holla!

[–] brillotti 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

The magnetosphere has been weakening in strength due to the ongoing pole shift over the past 30 years, which will peak in the 2040s when the poles will fully shift. I pray there will be no solar flares in the direction of earth during this event, otherwise most of unshielded electric equipment will get fried, including energy infrastructure.

Magnetic pole shifting

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

No way. Is that really happening? The magnetic poles are flipping the 2040s? How often does that happen? Old compasses won't be correct? Will it affect anything else (Aurora Borealis?, etc?)

I'm plumb flummoxed.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Shardikprime 2 points 1 month ago

This guy Earth's

[–] Jumi 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Interesting name for a dog, not gonna lie

[–] Cocodapuf 1 points 1 month ago

Maggy for short, I'm sure of it.

[–] RedditWanderer 4 points 1 month ago

Venusforming earth is a lot like terraforming mars, it's just hard to reach. If 200 years ago we were able to easily reach mars, we would have fucked up that too

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Musk is desperately trying to make "women come from Venus, men from Mars" reality

[–] Shardikprime 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Not one single government cares so much about it tho.

Higher temperatures will free up soil for agriculture in upper and lower latitudes. With luck, population size will keep increasing then for those countries and also quality of life

Coastal cities can fight it, at least some to some degree.

If we get fusion between our lifetimes, things are going to get even better

[–] zarathustra0 13 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Not one single government cares so much about it tho.

Way to generalise, bro. There are some low lying island states that are going to disappear under the rising sea levels. I think they are taking it pretty seriously.

Don't bullshit please.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Hellsfire29 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Earth has been around for 4.5 million years. Humans have only been around for 300,000 years approximately. With only a few hundred years of the industrial age.

Would a few hundred years really cause an extinction event?

That's interesting to think about..... Perhaps it'll take a few hundreds/thousand years to fix. If it can be fixed.... Or we get hit by an asteroid first.....

Between cutting down all of the trees and other pollutants, like these so called environmentalists flying around in their own private jets, it'll be fun for a while.

Either the humans will die off due to global warming/runaway greenhouse effect before interstellar travel is achieved, or the humans will die off due to the suns transformation into a red giant before interstellar travel is achieved.

IDK. Either way, we won't be here for long. But the earth will be long after us.

Will technology save the human race beyond the two inevitable events? Probably not.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I assume that the red giant sun engulfing the earth will produce enough drag that earth loses momentum and falls into the sun permanently. We’ll still be gone by then, but noting is forever, even the earth itself.

[–] Hellsfire29 2 points 1 month ago

Yes , you're right. The red giant will consume the Earth.

We won't be alive if there's a mass Exodus from earth, but is that even possible?

Probably not

[–] AdamEatsAss 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Venus does have a lot of valuable materials, this could be a good thing.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

I can’t wait to see the shareholder value.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

I'd rather live somewhere habitable than somewhere with "valuable materials".

[–] mojofrododojo 1 points 1 month ago

The government never built a weather machine. But the oil companies built a carbon machine that's doing a fantastic job changing the weather, and they knew it 50 years ago.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

We're just trying to make it more hospitable to women. They're from Venus, after all.

load more comments
view more: next ›