this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2024
574 points (97.7% liked)

Political Memes

5433 readers
2881 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] paddirn 16 points 6 hours ago (3 children)

I'm assuming it's working as intended.

[–] halcyoncmdr 3 points 4 hours ago

The Senate is. The House is not. The artificial limit of 435 set in 1911 has turned it into a pseudo-Senate and done a lot of harm to this country. With the same population representation as then, we should have around 1600 Representatives now.

A lot of the issues we currently have in Congress simply wouldn't exist with the House operating as it was designed.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 hours ago

To benefit Southern slave states and sparsely populated rural states? Check.

[–] GardenVarietyAnxiety 1 points 5 hours ago

Exactly. It's capitalism. The land is more valuable than the people on it.

(This is my observation, not my personal opinion)

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 hours ago (4 children)

To be fair, small states would never agreed to the constution without the senate.

Southern states would not have agreed to the constitution without the 3/5 compromise.

The United States would not exist without these compromises. The constitition is, as CGP Grey calls it, a Compromise-titution.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

Disingenuous. That's 21 states and 42 senators.

Now do representatives, which was originally supposed to match population distribution.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Don't blame the founding fathers that all these hippies moved to California /s

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 hours ago

The hippies were already there. The tech CEOs and Hollywood actors are an invasive species.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 hours ago (4 children)

To be fair, it is the united ´states´, not the united ´people living on the continent´. It wouldn’t be any more fair if California was making the decisions for 20 other states, just because they happen to have a crap load of people. The federal government is kind of supposed to be making decisions and maintaining things between states, not all these decisions affecting the people so directly.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 hours ago

Electorates per capita work better because they give the population of a country an equal amount of electable government. Positioning them as just Californians makes them a lower class citizen of the United States with lesser representation.

It also means that criminals will recognise the power of the Republican states and side with them for effect.

[–] ronalicious 6 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

to be fair? fuck that. the states represent people, just arguing 'states rights' is disingenuous at this point.

land shouldn't vote, but the way our government currently is functioning, regardless of what our slaveholding 'founding fathers' intended, is an absolute mess.

and I don't accept your argument in good faith.

edit. a word

[–] ABCDE 6 points 6 hours ago

It wouldn’t be any more fair if California was making the decisions for 20 other states

U wot

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›