this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2024
99 points (70.0% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7462 readers
329 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
all 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] timewarp 57 points 2 months ago (2 children)

100%. It wasn't just the genocide though. They alienated the progressives. Kamala was scared to actually talk outside of mostly scripted messaging and interviews. They didn't provide and explain strong progressive policies. To me, Kamala was pretty indistinguishable from Joe Biden and other corporate Democrats. Her picking Tim Walz was a great move and she was way up in the polls. Had she leaned into him more, broke from Joe Biden (even thrown him under the bus a bit), and turned to other progressives for advice rather than the DNC corporate consultants, she would have won.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

The Dems will always alienate their leftward sections, they serve monopolist capitalists just like the republicans do. It's time for liberals to be radicalized and read theory, join orgs, and join leftists.

If anyone wants a good intro list on Marxist theory, I can provide one.

[–] Blue_Morpho -5 points 2 months ago (2 children)

To me, Kamala was pretty indistinguishable from Joe Biden and other corporate Democrats.

But Joe Biden beat Trump. Seems like she could have won by being more like Joe Biden.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago

Male. And white.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago

Biden beat Trump during COVID and when Trump was the incumbent. Being, "not the other guy" works a lot better when you aren't currently the president when the bad things are happening.

Given high inflation that was never balanced by wages or deflation and an ongoing sponsored genocide, "more of the same" and a near complete lack of major policy positions means hewing close to the unpopular incumbent.

Also she literally never won a primary. She lost to Yang lmao. This was donors shoving a pro-gemocide empty suit candidate down peoples' throats. "Winning" is a secondary goal to choosing the candidates.

[–] [email protected] 37 points 2 months ago (1 children)

They always will, they serve the same donors and bourgeois powers. Marx and Lenin are vindicated by the passage of time. They were not clairvoyant, they just accurately analyzed the systems around them and saw what necessarily follows from their directions.

Everyone, get organized, read theory, learn self-defense and self-sufficiency. A good primer is Blackshirts and Reds. Defend yourselves and protect each other.

[–] ramenshaman 16 points 2 months ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 months ago

Trump cares about Trump. That’s the long and short of his ideology. He only cares about genocide to the extent that it might benefit him, otherwise he’d rather play golf.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 months ago

Ah, so the choice was between genocide or genocide.

I guess if both sides are evil then people just rationally choose the side that's at least honest.

[–] thecam 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I thought Trump was garbage.

[–] ramenshaman 6 points 2 months ago

¿Por que no los dos?