this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2024
24 points (96.2% liked)

Google Pixel

5986 readers
12 users here now

The World's Google Pixel community!

This community is for lemmings to gather and discuss all things related to the Google Pixel phone and other related hardware. Feel free to ask questions, seek advice, and engage in discussions around the Pixel and its ecosystem.

We ask you to be polite when addressing others and respect Lemmy.world's rules.

NSFW content is not allowed and will immediately get you banned.

It also goes without saying that self-promotion of any nature and referral links are not allowed. When in doubt, contact the mod team first.

Also, please, no politics.

For more general Android discussions, see [email protected].

This community is not in any way affiliated with Google. If you are looking for customer support regarding your Pixel phone, look here instead: https://support.google.com/pixelphone/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

According to a new report, Google’s cost for producing a PIxel 9 Pro is just over $400, which might be...

top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] solrize -2 points 1 month ago (6 children)

I thought one of the "laws" of consumer electronics was that retail price of a product has to be at least 5x the BOM cost. So for the Pixel 9 Pro to be profitable, there must be a heck of a lot of post-sale revenue coming in from advertising. Ugh.

What does a Pixel 9 Pro do that a $200 retail Moto G doesn't?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

What does a Pixel 9 Pro do that a $200 retail Moto G doesn't?

Laser thermometer.

Also GrapheneOS's requirements.

[–] jenny_ball 6 points 1 month ago

it's natively rootable

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)
  • camera sensors (larger and more expensive)
  • screen (very high brightness)
  • processor/SoC (faster, has 7 years of driver support)
  • open source support (can build your own AOSP ROM or use Graphene, etc)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Emphasis on the support. I bought a moto phone (I think an E, not a G) that got 0 major software updates. I think it got a 0.0.1 path or something so minor you'd never notice.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Isn't the pixel intended to serve as a model/benchmark Android phone?

That's what the Nexus was.

I suspect for Google it's about demonstrating what Android can do, so more about marketing than direct profit.

[–] jqubed 2 points 1 month ago

I think it depends on the price point, size of the market, and how much competition is in the market. If you’re selling 10 million of something you can probably get away with some slimmer margins than 1 million.

[–] glimse -2 points 1 month ago

Uhh ummm uhhh it's better because it does....AI! And we all love AI, right? That's why they're putting it in everything. They know us better than we know ourselves...