this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2024
213 points (99.5% liked)

News

23352 readers
3412 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

In Pennsylvania, a key battleground state, over 4,000 overseas ballots were challenged across 14 counties, targeting voters like Mariam Larson, a longtime mail-in voter from Canada.

Challenges allege non-residency for voters not in the military, yet federal law permits citizens abroad to vote in federal elections. The ACLU argues these challenges are invalid and mass-produced, urging counties to dismiss them quickly.

Some counties have received these challenges, filed by the Election Research Institute, despite similar lawsuits failing. The Election Research Institute is led by Heather Honey, a prominent activist who has spread false claims about elections.

top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 60 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Pennsylvania law requires someone to be a resident of the state to vote.
Federal law allows American citizens to vote in federal elections in the last place in the US they lived if they are living overseas.

How the fuck can there be conflicting laws on the state and federal level regarding your right to vote???
Isn't this something that should have been resolved in the past 200 years or so?

[–] MicroWave 73 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

The US Constitution already resolves this issue with federal preemption under the Supremacy Clause. Basically, Pennsylvania’s residency requirements apply to all elections within the state: local, state, and federal. However, in federal elections, federal law preempts and overrides any conflicting state laws. These challenges have been filed in bad faith.

[–] FlyingSquid 29 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

But they will gum things up without the justice system acting swiftly. And it could be Trump-appointed justices overseeing them

[–] MicroWave 20 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Exactly, I think the real intent here is to cause delays and spread confusion.

[–] grue 5 points 2 weeks ago

More specifically, it's to delay the count past the deadline for certification, so that they can throw the disputed votes out, throw the whole state's votes out, prevent either candidate from passing the EC threshold and force a contingent election, etc.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

These challenges have been filed in ~~bad faith~~ the hopes that the current conservative SCOTUS will hear an emergency appeal and give the presidency to Trump.

Ftfy

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

Wait does that mean I’m an illegal voter under state law lol?

[–] [email protected] 40 points 2 weeks ago

FIFY: Over 4,000 overseas voters ballots baselessly challenged in Pennsylvania

[–] [email protected] 34 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The Election Research Institute is led by Heather Honey, a prominent activist who has spread false claims about elections.

This is the game. Challenge everything as much as possible. Even if very little of it sticks, two big things have will have happened:

  1. Some number of actual votes will have been invalidated -- often from groups more likely to vote blue.

  2. The same groups making the challenges can claim that the multitude of challenges are themselves evidence of problems with the electoral system. (This should be impossible, but it seems to be a common tactic when googling from your armchair counts as "research".)

[–] tb_ 10 points 2 weeks ago
  1. Contested votes will be counted later, making Trump's early count appear proportionally bigger which will give even more "reason" for claiming fraud when Kamala suddenly ticks up.
[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago

The Election Research Institute is led by Heather Honey…

Based on their website, I’m pretty sure the Election Research Institute is Heather Honey.

[–] paraphrand 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

What’s a non-key battleground state?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

a state like nevada. It’s gonna be real close but if you do the math in 98% of scenarios it won’t matter who wins it just because of how the electoral votes puzzle together.