this post was submitted on 01 Nov 2024
336 points (94.2% liked)

Science Memes

11354 readers
2283 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ekZepp 116 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 42 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Gotta admit the way the meme crops the rest the face out makes it look metal as hell. That's a great monster design.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

I agree. My first thought was "that's a great hell hound."

[–] [email protected] 37 points 1 month ago (1 children)

this ant still looks scary to me

the last two are friend shaped

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Looks more like a jim henson creation than scary

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 month ago

Extremely cute:

[–] [email protected] 60 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Is no one going to comment on the "magnified five times under a microscope"? Five times? What kind of weak, low refraction plastic lens, cost of bubblegum microscope are you using to magnify your enormous monster ants?

[–] Nikelui 10 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Considering the size of an ant and the picture, I'd say at least 50x

[–] davidgro 7 points 1 month ago

What is this, a magnification for ants?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

400x is more than enough to see and differentiate eukaryotic cells so I feel like 50x might be a slight overshot

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

At first I thought 5 orders of magnitude, but 10,000x is way off. The closest I can reckon is they mean "magnified 100% five times", i.e. 2⁵, or 32x, which seems like it could be right.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Browsing on a 32" monitor, "I wonder how they handle cat-sized ants where ever that's from".

[–] [email protected] 50 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It's "less" frightening when you realize those red things aren't the eyes, and the “teeth” are more like a mustache for its mandibles; like the other pictures in the comments that show them better

[–] angrystego 31 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

This picture has no right to say it shows a face when it omits the eyes and jaws. It's like posting a picture of a human nose and saying what an ugly face people have.

[–] stupidcasey 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Given a single bulldog ant can kill a full grown adult and we are several orders of magnitude larger than them and there are 20 quadrillion of them each able to lift 50 times their own weight yeah, I would say it’s a good thing we are bigger than them.

Nothing to do with the picture of this ants antennas though.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

I hadn't heard about bulldog ants before and was incredulous about your statement, but damn, yeah, bulldog ants are wild

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Myrmecia_(ant)#interaction%20with%20humans

[–] M137 5 points 1 month ago

It looks like Josef Fritzl...

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

Elden Ring ants support this

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Thanking nature because of the ant face and not how it will gank up on you, inject you with paralysing venom, and tear you apart?